← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

inlabru vs smam

A side-by-side editorial comparison of inlabru and smam — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

inlabru vs smam: at a glance

Featureinlabrusmam
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-modelling, spatial-statistics, r-package, api-consolidationanimal-movement, stochastic-processes, state-space-models, rcpp
Last editorial update36m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is inlabru?

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

Read the full inlabru trajectory →

What is smam?

Animal-movement models in R, where new stochastic processes arrive years apart.

smam fits statistical models of animal movement, covering moving-resting processes with and without measurement error, moving-resting-handling, and moving-moving processes, with simulation, point estimation and variance estimation for each. The last three releases are pure upkeep: guarding Rf_error calls after an Rcpp update, a maintainer email change, and a compiler warning fix. The substantive work in this window is 0.7.0, which added estimate and vcov generics across all fit functions, and 0.6.0, which added the moving-moving process.

Read the full smam trajectory →

inlabru vs smam: editorial side-by-side

I
inlabru
INFRA · APIS
2.5

A Bayesian spatial modelling package rebuilding its foundations one breaking release at a time

◆ Current state

inlabru wraps INLA for spatial, point-process and latent-Gaussian models in R. It is mid-modernisation: since 2.12.0 cut the sp stack, each release has renamed part of the public surface, standardised how external packages attach custom mappers, or replaced internal machinery. 2.15.0 is the latest step, pairing a new predictor evaluation and linearisation implementation with broom's tidy(), glance() and augment() methods and four non-zero-truncated observation families.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is consolidation of the extension surface rather than expansion of the model catalogue. Every release adds mappers or families with one hand and removes a dependency, a re-export or a deprecated path with the other — plyr in 2.15.0, fmesher's Depends entry in 2.14.1, sp and ggmap in 2.12.0. The compatibility flag bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable and the temporary fm_int/fm_pixels re-exports show a maintainer sequencing breaks across releases instead of landing them together.

◆ Prediction

The 2.14 compatibility flag is still defaulting to TRUE and the fmesher re-exports are described in the entries as temporary, so the next obvious move is a release that flips bru_compat_pre_2_14_enable off and drops those re-exports.

S
smam
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Animal-movement models in R, where new stochastic processes arrive years apart.

◆ Current state

smam fits statistical models of animal movement, covering moving-resting processes with and without measurement error, moving-resting-handling, and moving-moving processes, with simulation, point estimation and variance estimation for each. The last three releases are pure upkeep: guarding Rf_error calls after an Rcpp update, a maintainer email change, and a compiler warning fix. The substantive work in this window is 0.7.0, which added estimate and vcov generics across all fit functions, and 0.6.0, which added the moving-moving process.

◆ Where it's heading

This package grows by adding process models, and it does so rarely. Between the moving-moving process in 2021 and now, the only interface-level change has been the 0.7.0 generics that gave every fit function a common way to retrieve estimates and their covariance, which is consolidation of an accumulated collection rather than expansion of it. The three releases since are entirely reactive to toolchain and CRAN pressure, and they arrive in step with the maintainer's other package coga, which received the same Rcpp guard within twenty minutes on the same day.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to be CRAN and Rcpp maintenance unless a new movement process is published, which is what has historically prompted a minor version here. The generics added in 0.7.0 give any future process model a ready-made interface to slot into.

Alternatives to inlabru and smam

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either inlabru or smam.

See all inlabru alternatives → · See all smam alternatives →

Recent activity from inlabru and smam

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agoinlabruPredictor linearisation rewritten; broom tidiers, truncated families
  2. 3mo agoinlabruBugfix release: factor contrasts, raster extraction, error classes
  3. 5mo agoinlabruNew mappers, standardised cgeneric support, bru_obs storage refactor
  4. 5mo agosmamRcpp attributes regenerated to guard Rf_error calls
  5. 1y agoinlabruMapper classes shortened to bm_*, experimental predictor aggregation
  6. 1y agoinlabruDrops sp and ggmap for an sf-native spatial stack
  7. 2y agosmamMaintainer email updated
  8. 2y agosmamCompiler format-security warning resolved
  9. 2y agosmamestimate and vcov generics unify all fit functions
  10. 5y agosmamMoving-moving process added with simulation and estimation
  11. 5y agosmamVariance estimators adjusted; example dataset added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between inlabru and smam?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is inlabru better than smam?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inlabru is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to inlabru?

Top inlabru alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inlabru alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inlabru for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to smam?

Top smam alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "smam alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/smam for the full list with editorial commentary on each.