← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

BayLum vs profoc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of BayLum and profoc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

BayLum vs profoc: at a glance

FeatureBayLumprofoc
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-statistics, luminescence-dating, geochronology, jagsforecasting, online-learning, r-package, rcpp
Last editorial update30m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is BayLum?

Bayesian luminescence dating that finally replaced its folder-structure input format.

BayLum runs Bayesian age models for luminescence and combined OSL/C-14 dating on top of JAGS. The 2024 release rebuilt the front end: a single create_DataFile() replaces the separate single-grain and multi-grain generators, reads BIN/BINX and XSYG directly, and takes a YAML config in place of the old prescribed folder layout. Since then the work has been CRAN compliance and documentation.

Read the full BayLum trajectory →

What is profoc?

A forecast combination package that spun its profiler out into its own project

profoc combines probabilistic forecasts online, using the Bernstein online aggregation family with B-spline smoothing over quantiles and time. The recent releases are infrastructure rather than method: 1.3.4 removed a using namespace arma directive for CRAN compliance and closed a timer edge case, 1.3.3 adjusted the integration with rcpptimer against its now-stable 1.2.0 API. The last release to change what users can do was 1.3.0, which exposed the conline C++ class to R and exported init_experts_list(), make_basis_mats(), make_hat_mats() and post_process_model() so the engine can be driven directly.

Read the full profoc trajectory →

BayLum vs profoc: editorial side-by-side

B
BayLum
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Bayesian luminescence dating that finally replaced its folder-structure input format.

◆ Current state

BayLum runs Bayesian age models for luminescence and combined OSL/C-14 dating on top of JAGS. The 2024 release rebuilt the front end: a single create_DataFile() replaces the separate single-grain and multi-grain generators, reads BIN/BINX and XSYG directly, and takes a YAML config in place of the old prescribed folder layout. Since then the work has been CRAN compliance and documentation.

◆ Where it's heading

Two long-running threads have converged: making JAGS runs survivable (parallel methods, halved MCMC memory, injectable custom models) and making the inputs survivable (YAML config, consistency checks, auto-detected sample names). With the deprecated generators on their way out, the next phase is removal rather than addition. Release cadence is roughly annual and slowing.

◆ Prediction

The deprecated Generate_DataFile(), Generate_DataFile_MG() and LT_RegenDose() are the obvious next casualties; a release that drops them would be the first breaking change since the YAML rework.

P
profoc
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A forecast combination package that spun its profiler out into its own project

◆ Current state

profoc combines probabilistic forecasts online, using the Bernstein online aggregation family with B-spline smoothing over quantiles and time. The recent releases are infrastructure rather than method: 1.3.4 removed a using namespace arma directive for CRAN compliance and closed a timer edge case, 1.3.3 adjusted the integration with rcpptimer against its now-stable 1.2.0 API. The last release to change what users can do was 1.3.0, which exposed the conline C++ class to R and exported init_experts_list(), make_basis_mats(), make_hat_mats() and post_process_model() so the engine can be driven directly.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is toward a reusable C++ core with thin language bindings. The timing code that lived inside profoc was extracted into the standalone rcpptimer package in 1.3.2, deliberately so other R packages and Python projects could use it through cpptimer and cppytimer, and the clock header was reworked in 1.3.1 to maximise the code shared between the R and Python versions. Method work sits earlier in the history - periodic splines and penalties in 1.2.0, the penalty() function in 1.1.0 - while the recent cadence, a single release in the last sixteen months, points at a package the maintainer considers finished.

◆ Prediction

The repeated references to future Python use suggest the next significant work happens outside this package, in the shared C++ components, rather than in profoc's R surface.

Alternatives to BayLum and profoc

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either BayLum or profoc.

See all BayLum alternatives → · See all profoc alternatives →

Recent activity from BayLum and profoc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoprofocCRAN compliance fix removing a namespace directive
  2. 10mo agoBayLumCRAN anchor fixes and an R 4.4 floor
  3. 1y agoprofocTimer integration updated to the stable rcpptimer API
  4. 2y agoBayLumOne data-file function and a YAML config replace the folder layout
  5. 2y agoprofocTiming code extracted into the standalone rcpptimer package
  6. 2y agoprofocInteger overflow fix and Welford timing statistics
  7. 2y agoprofocThe conline C++ class opens up to R users
  8. 2y agoprofocQuantile crossing flagged and tidy methods added
  9. 3y agoBayLumMCMC memory halved; density plots for age distributions
  10. 3y agoBayLumParallel JAGS runs and a file-scaffolding helper
  11. 4y agoBayLumCustom model injection and RNG control for parallel runs
  12. 5y agoBayLumParallel JAGS experiment plus IntCal20-era calibration data

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between BayLum and profoc?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. BayLum and profoc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is BayLum better than profoc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. BayLum and profoc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to BayLum?

Top BayLum alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "BayLum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/baylum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to profoc?

Top profoc alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "profoc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/profoc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.