← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

ipaddress vs profoc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ipaddress and profoc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:rcppr-package

ipaddress vs profoc: at a glance

Featureipaddressprofoc
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesnetworking, ip-addresses, rcpp, vctrsforecasting, online-learning, r-package, rcpp
Last editorial update26m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ipaddress?

IP address vectors for R that hit 1.0 and then went quiet.

ipaddress gives R first-class IPv4 and IPv6 vector types with the arithmetic, netmask and subnet operations that come with them, backed by C++. The 1.0.0 release in 2023 was the deliberate breaking cleanup: one result per input from the hostname functions, vectorised subnets(), several arguments forced to be named, and a country_networks() downloader added. Since then the only release has been a testthat deprecation fix.

Read the full ipaddress trajectory →

What is profoc?

A forecast combination package that spun its profiler out into its own project

profoc combines probabilistic forecasts online, using the Bernstein online aggregation family with B-spline smoothing over quantiles and time. The recent releases are infrastructure rather than method: 1.3.4 removed a using namespace arma directive for CRAN compliance and closed a timer edge case, 1.3.3 adjusted the integration with rcpptimer against its now-stable 1.2.0 API. The last release to change what users can do was 1.3.0, which exposed the conline C++ class to R and exported init_experts_list(), make_basis_mats(), make_hat_mats() and post_process_model() so the engine can be driven directly.

Read the full profoc trajectory →

ipaddress vs profoc: editorial side-by-side

I
ipaddress
INFRA · APIS
0.0

IP address vectors for R that hit 1.0 and then went quiet.

◆ Current state

ipaddress gives R first-class IPv4 and IPv6 vector types with the arithmetic, netmask and subnet operations that come with them, backed by C++. The 1.0.0 release in 2023 was the deliberate breaking cleanup: one result per input from the hostname functions, vectorised subnets(), several arguments forced to be named, and a country_networks() downloader added. Since then the only release has been a testthat deprecation fix.

◆ Where it's heading

The package reached the interface it wanted and stopped. The five releases before 1.0.0 were almost entirely CRAN check compliance — deprecated C++ calls, HTML5 notes, a Windows toolchain change — with functional work confined to a couple of releases that shed heavy dependencies. That pattern, long compliance runs punctuated by rare interface work, is what the feed shows now.

◆ Prediction

On this cadence the next release is most likely another CRAN or upstream-testing compliance patch; nothing in the entries indicates new functionality in progress.

P
profoc
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A forecast combination package that spun its profiler out into its own project

◆ Current state

profoc combines probabilistic forecasts online, using the Bernstein online aggregation family with B-spline smoothing over quantiles and time. The recent releases are infrastructure rather than method: 1.3.4 removed a using namespace arma directive for CRAN compliance and closed a timer edge case, 1.3.3 adjusted the integration with rcpptimer against its now-stable 1.2.0 API. The last release to change what users can do was 1.3.0, which exposed the conline C++ class to R and exported init_experts_list(), make_basis_mats(), make_hat_mats() and post_process_model() so the engine can be driven directly.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is toward a reusable C++ core with thin language bindings. The timing code that lived inside profoc was extracted into the standalone rcpptimer package in 1.3.2, deliberately so other R packages and Python projects could use it through cpptimer and cppytimer, and the clock header was reworked in 1.3.1 to maximise the code shared between the R and Python versions. Method work sits earlier in the history - periodic splines and penalties in 1.2.0, the penalty() function in 1.1.0 - while the recent cadence, a single release in the last sixteen months, points at a package the maintainer considers finished.

◆ Prediction

The repeated references to future Python use suggest the next significant work happens outside this package, in the shared C++ components, rather than in profoc's R surface.

Alternatives to ipaddress and profoc

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ipaddress or profoc.

See all ipaddress alternatives → · See all profoc alternatives →

Recent activity from ipaddress and profoc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoprofocCRAN compliance fix removing a namespace directive
  2. 0y agoipaddresstestthat deprecation warnings resolved
  3. 1y agoprofocTimer integration updated to the stable rcpptimer API
  4. 2y agoprofocTiming code extracted into the standalone rcpptimer package
  5. 2y agoprofocInteger overflow fix and Welford timing statistics
  6. 2y agoprofocThe conline C++ class opens up to R users
  7. 2y agoprofocQuantile crossing flagged and tidy methods added
  8. 3y agoipaddress1.0.0 breaks the interface to make it vector-native
  9. 3y agoipaddressDeprecated C++ sprintf calls replaced
  10. 4y agoipaddressroxygen upgrade to clear HTML5 check notes
  11. 4y agoipaddressWindows compiler toolchain compatibility for R 4.2
  12. 5y agoipaddressHotfix for CRAN check warnings

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ipaddress and profoc?

Both compete on the same themes — rcpp, r-package — within Infra & APIs. ipaddress and profoc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ipaddress better than profoc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ipaddress and profoc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ipaddress?

Top ipaddress alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ipaddress alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ipaddress for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to profoc?

Top profoc alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "profoc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/profoc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.