osmdata
osmdata keeps tightening its Overpass query surface, breaking small things to get types right.
Comparison · Analytics
bayestestR vs modelbased
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bayestestR and modelbased — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:easystats
bayestestR vs modelbased: at a glance
What is bayestestR?
Bayesian diagnostics get stricter defaults while the Stan backend list widens
bayestestR is the diagnostics and hypothesis-testing layer of the easystats stack, and its recent releases have concentrated on two things: reporting the right uncertainty numbers by default, and accepting posterior draws from more sources. The 0.18.x line added CmdStanFit support alongside the existing rstanarm/brms paths and switched effective-sample-size reporting to tail-ESS. Bug-fix releases in between are mostly CRAN-check maintenance.
What is modelbased?
modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar
modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.
bayestestR vs modelbased: editorial side-by-side
bayestestR
0.0ANALYTICS
Bayesian diagnostics get stricter defaults while the Stan backend list widens
◆ Current state
bayestestR is the diagnostics and hypothesis-testing layer of the easystats stack, and its recent releases have concentrated on two things: reporting the right uncertainty numbers by default, and accepting posterior draws from more sources. The 0.18.x line added CmdStanFit support alongside the existing rstanarm/brms paths and switched effective-sample-size reporting to tail-ESS. Bug-fix releases in between are mostly CRAN-check maintenance.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is converging on a single posture: work with raw MCMC draws from anywhere, and report the diagnostic that actually governs the interval being shown. Successive releases have swapped defaults rather than added surface area, and the efficiency work in 0.16.x aimed squarely at large brms and rstanarm fits. Output formatting is drifting toward the shared easystats display() and tinytable path.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued backend coverage on the Stan side and further alignment of print/display behavior with insight and the rest of easystats; the entries do not show a push into new inference methods.
modelbased
0.0ANALYTICS
modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar
◆ Current state
modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is building a compositional vocabulary rather than a fixed menu — contrasts of average slopes, contrasts across two numeric predictors, inequality summaries across all outcome categories, and now user-supplied post-processing of comparisons. Support quietly widens underneath, covering nestedLogit, brms finite mixtures, and offsets under population and average estimation. Plotting gets attention in proportion to how often these results are presented rather than tabulated, including collapse_by_group() for showing averaged raw data under mixed-model fits.
◆ Prediction
With post_process and omnibus tests both landed, the likely next step is making these composed comparisons easier to report — formatting or plotting methods for the multi-step results rather than new comparison types.
Alternatives to bayestestR and modelbased
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bayestestR or modelbased.
posterior
posterior keeps deepening two things: the rvar type and Pareto-based diagnostics.
rredlist
rredlist threw out its species-centric API in 1.0.0 and rebuilt around assessments.
esquisse
esquisse's 1.0 turned a point-and-click addin into embeddable Shiny modules.
mlr3proba
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
mlr3viz
mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out
See all bayestestR alternatives → · See all modelbased alternatives →
Recent activity from bayestestR and modelbased
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.16.0 adds post-processing and omnibus contrast tests
- 2mo agobayestestRmcse() gains a centrality argument
- 2mo agobayestestRCmdStanFit support and tail-ESS as the default diagnostic
- 3mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.15.0 contrasts average slopes across numeric predictors
- 5mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.14.0 renames trend to slope and adds collapse_by_group()
- 8mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.1 adds marginal group-level estimates and as.data.frame()
- 11mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.0 adds inequality ratios and slope marginalization
- 11mo agobayestestRrope() gains complement probabilities; display() methods added
- 1y agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.12.0 introduces marginal effects inequality measures
- 1y agobayestestRdescribe_posterior() efficiency and multinomial handling
- 1y agobayestestReffects argument changes behavior for large brms/rstanarm fits
- 1y agobayestestRTail ESS returned from effective_sample() and its callers
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between bayestestR and modelbased?
Both compete on the same themes — easystats — within Analytics. bayestestR and modelbased are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is bayestestR better than modelbased?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bayestestR and modelbased are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to bayestestR?
Top bayestestR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bayestestR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bayestestr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to modelbased?
Top modelbased alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modelbased alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modelbased for the full list with editorial commentary on each.