JointFPM
Recurrent-event modelling settles, with mean_no() promoted to stable.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
BAS vs writeAlizer
A side-by-side editorial comparison of BAS and writeAlizer — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
BAS vs writeAlizer: at a glance
What is BAS?
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
BAS performs Bayesian variable selection and model averaging for linear and generalized linear models, sampling from a model space too large to enumerate. The visible history splits cleanly: 2023-2024 added sampling machinery — an adaptive independent MCMC sampler with Horvitz-Thompson estimation, hereditary-constraint counting — while 2.0.0 in late 2025 reworked how sampler output is allocated in C. The 2.0.2 patch is a PROTECT fix for rchk warnings.
What is writeAlizer?
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
BAS vs writeAlizer: editorial side-by-side
BAS
0.0INFRA · APIS
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
◆ Current state
BAS performs Bayesian variable selection and model averaging for linear and generalized linear models, sampling from a model space too large to enumerate. The visible history splits cleanly: 2023-2024 added sampling machinery — an adaptive independent MCMC sampler with Horvitz-Thompson estimation, hereditary-constraint counting — while 2.0.0 in late 2025 reworked how sampler output is allocated in C. The 2.0.2 patch is a PROTECT fix for rchk warnings.
◆ Where it's heading
Memory is the binding constraint and the releases say so directly. The hereditary-constraint counter, the GROW option, and the replacement of over-allocation with resizing all attack the same problem: n.models is a guess, and guessing high wastes memory on problems where few unique models are actually visited. The 2.0.0 work was additionally forced by R tightening its C API against non-API calls like SETLENGTH, a constraint every C-heavy CRAN package has been absorbing. Method development has been quiet since 1.7.x.
◆ Prediction
The 1.7.5 notes call the hereditary-constraint counting a first step and say future updates will cover other constraint types, including polynomials, which remain unhandled. That is the one concrete commitment in this history, though nothing since has returned to it.
writeAlizer
0.0INFRA · APIS
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
◆ Current state
writeAlizer generates predicted writing-quality scores from features produced by Coh-Metrix, ReaderBench and GAMET, downloading its trained scoring models on demand. Every release in this window — nine of them between September 2025 and February 2026 — is about that download path rather than the scoring: classed error conditions, checksum verification, an offline mode, a mockable artifact directory, and dependency reporting for the model families a user actually invokes.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is being made safe to distribute. CRAN's policy on packages that reach the internet drove the first wave — graceful failure, tests that preflight their URLs and skip, examples seeded from a local mock model — and 1.7.0 turned the accumulated fixes into structure with named error classes for each failure mode. Only 1.7.2 adds anything a user would ask for: filename handling for Coh-Metrix and GAMET outputs that arrive as paths.
◆ Prediction
With the artifact registry hardened and documented, the pressure that produced nine releases in six months should ease, and attention can return to the models themselves — the vignette on scoring-model development added in 1.7.2 hints at that. Nothing here promises new models.
Alternatives to BAS and writeAlizer
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either BAS or writeAlizer.
CptNonPar
Nonparametric change point detection swaps p-values for importance scores.
ggprism
A Prism-styled ggplot2 theme in maintenance, now surviving ggplot2 4.0.
TrendLSW
Wavelet trend estimation tightens the defaults it shipped with.
mmpca
Back from CRAN removal under a new maintainer, with the compiled layer rebuilt.
mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
See all BAS alternatives → · See all writeAlizer alternatives →
Recent activity from BAS and writeAlizer
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6mo agowriteAlizerOne example rewrapped to silence a CRAN check note
- 8mo agoBASBAS 2.0.2
- 8mo agoBASBAS 2.0.0
- 8mo agowriteAlizerFilename stems recovered from Coh-Metrix and GAMET paths
- 10mo agowriteAlizerOffline example guard, declared as no API change
- 10mo agowriteAlizerNamed error classes for every model-download failure mode
- 10mo agowriteAlizerNetwork failures degrade gracefully under CRAN policy
- 11mo agowriteAlizerwa_seed_example_models() exported and documented
- 1y agoBASBAS 1.7.5
- 1y agoBASBAS 1.7.3
- 1y agoBASBAS 1.7.2
- 2y agoBASBAS 1.7.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between BAS and writeAlizer?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. BAS and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is BAS better than writeAlizer?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. BAS and writeAlizer are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to BAS?
Top BAS alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "BAS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bas for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to writeAlizer?
Top writeAlizer alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "writeAlizer alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/writealizer for the full list with editorial commentary on each.