← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

BAS vs slendr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of BAS and slendr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

BAS vs slendr: at a glance

FeatureBASslendr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesbayesian-statistics, model-averaging, mcmc, r-packagepopulation-genetics, simulation, tree-sequences, python-interop
Last editorial update1h ago6h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is BAS?

A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.

BAS performs Bayesian variable selection and model averaging for linear and generalized linear models, sampling from a model space too large to enumerate. The visible history splits cleanly: 2023-2024 added sampling machinery — an adaptive independent MCMC sampler with Horvitz-Thompson estimation, hereditary-constraint counting — while 2.0.0 in late 2025 reworked how sampler output is allocated in C. The 2.0.2 patch is a PROTECT fix for rchk warnings.

Read the full BAS trajectory →

What is slendr?

Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.

slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().

Read the full slendr trajectory →

BAS vs slendr: editorial side-by-side

B
BAS
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.

◆ Current state

BAS performs Bayesian variable selection and model averaging for linear and generalized linear models, sampling from a model space too large to enumerate. The visible history splits cleanly: 2023-2024 added sampling machinery — an adaptive independent MCMC sampler with Horvitz-Thompson estimation, hereditary-constraint counting — while 2.0.0 in late 2025 reworked how sampler output is allocated in C. The 2.0.2 patch is a PROTECT fix for rchk warnings.

◆ Where it's heading

Memory is the binding constraint and the releases say so directly. The hereditary-constraint counter, the GROW option, and the replacement of over-allocation with resizing all attack the same problem: n.models is a guess, and guessing high wastes memory on problems where few unique models are actually visited. The 2.0.0 work was additionally forced by R tightening its C API against non-API calls like SETLENGTH, a constraint every C-heavy CRAN package has been absorbing. Method development has been quiet since 1.7.x.

◆ Prediction

The 1.7.5 notes call the hereditary-constraint counting a first step and say future updates will cover other constraint types, including polynomials, which remain unhandled. That is the one concrete commitment in this history, though nothing since has returned to it.

S
slendr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.

◆ Current state

slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().

◆ Where it's heading

Since the 1.0.0 release added non-neutral simulation, the work has shifted from capability to friction. A large share of recent notes concerns Python environment handling, conda activation races on Windows, dependency pruning that made shiny optional, and argument names that misled users, as when gene_flow()'s rate argument turned out to mean total ancestry proportion rather than a rate. That is the profile of a package whose scientific surface is settled and whose remaining problems are the ones users actually hit.

◆ Prediction

Expect the uv-based environment path to move from fallback to default once it has proven itself, given the notes already describe an environment variable for making it so. The deprecated rate argument in gene_flow() is explicitly slated for removal in a future major release, which is the clearest signal here of what a 2.0 would contain.

Alternatives to BAS and slendr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either BAS or slendr.

See all BAS alternatives → · See all slendr alternatives →

Recent activity from BAS and slendr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoslendrEphemeral uv Python environments remove the setup step
  2. 7mo agoslendrgene_flow() separates migration rate from ancestry proportion
  3. 8mo agoBASBAS 2.0.2
  4. 8mo agoBASBAS 2.0.0
  5. 9mo agoslendrshiny made optional; SLiM 5.1 and Python 3.13 required
  6. 1y agoslendrconda activation reverted to a slower but reliable path
  7. 1y agoslendrBackends raised to SLiM 5.0, tskit 0.6.4 and msprime 1.3.4
  8. 1y agoBASBAS 1.7.5
  9. 1y agoslendrNon-neutral models arrive; slim() interface simplified
  10. 1y agoBASBAS 1.7.3
  11. 1y agoBASBAS 1.7.2
  12. 2y agoBASBAS 1.7.1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between BAS and slendr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. BAS and slendr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is BAS better than slendr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. BAS and slendr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to BAS?

Top BAS alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "BAS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bas for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to slendr?

Top slendr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "slendr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/slendr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.