← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

rsofun vs slendr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of rsofun and slendr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

rsofun vs slendr: at a glance

Featurersofunslendr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesecosystem-modelling, carbon-isotopes, land-use-change, fortranpopulation-genetics, simulation, tree-sequences, python-interop
Last editorial update50m ago6h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is rsofun?

An ecosystem model starts tracking carbon isotopes and land-use change.

rsofun wraps the P-model and BiomeE vegetation models in R with Fortran cores, covering photosynthesis, water balance and forest demography, plus Bayesian calibration. The 5.1.0 release is the first in the window to widen what the models simulate rather than reorganise them. Before it, the history is renaming, cost-function rewrites and output-format consistency work.

Read the full rsofun trajectory →

What is slendr?

Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.

slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().

Read the full slendr trajectory →

rsofun vs slendr: editorial side-by-side

R
rsofun
INFRA · APIS
0.0

An ecosystem model starts tracking carbon isotopes and land-use change.

◆ Current state

rsofun wraps the P-model and BiomeE vegetation models in R with Fortran cores, covering photosynthesis, water balance and forest demography, plus Bayesian calibration. The 5.1.0 release is the first in the window to widen what the models simulate rather than reorganise them. Before it, the history is renaming, cost-function rewrites and output-format consistency work.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is from a calibration harness toward a model that can answer different questions: isotope fractionation now comes out of the P-model, BiomeE handles land use and land-use change, and forcing can be recycled when a simulation outruns its data. Version stamps are unreliable here, with a v5.0 tag carrying only a build fix and predating v4.4, so the arc reads better through content than through numbering.

◆ Prediction

The isotope work is explicitly unfinished, with a constant atmospheric signature standing in for daily d13c forcing, so the next likely step is accepting that as model input.

S
slendr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.

◆ Current state

slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().

◆ Where it's heading

Since the 1.0.0 release added non-neutral simulation, the work has shifted from capability to friction. A large share of recent notes concerns Python environment handling, conda activation races on Windows, dependency pruning that made shiny optional, and argument names that misled users, as when gene_flow()'s rate argument turned out to mean total ancestry proportion rather than a rate. That is the profile of a package whose scientific surface is settled and whose remaining problems are the ones users actually hit.

◆ Prediction

Expect the uv-based environment path to move from fallback to default once it has proven itself, given the notes already describe an environment variable for making it so. The deprecated rate argument in gene_flow() is explicitly slated for removal in a future major release, which is the clearest signal here of what a 2.0 would contain.

Alternatives to rsofun and slendr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rsofun or slendr.

See all rsofun alternatives → · See all slendr alternatives →

Recent activity from rsofun and slendr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoslendrEphemeral uv Python environments remove the setup step
  2. 7mo agoslendrgene_flow() separates migration rate from ancestry proportion
  3. 9mo agoslendrshiny made optional; SLiM 5.1 and Python 3.13 required
  4. 10mo agorsofunCarbon isotope tracking and LULUC support across both models
  5. 1y agoslendrconda activation reverted to a slower but reliable path
  6. 1y agoslendrBackends raised to SLiM 5.0, tskit 0.6.4 and msprime 1.3.4
  7. 1y agorsofunLM3-PPA renamed BiomeE; cost function and stress functions rewritten
  8. 1y agorsofunParallel make fix on the v5.0 tag
  9. 1y agoslendrNon-neutral models arrive; slim() interface simplified
  10. 2y agorsofuncnmodel 0.1 research snapshot tag
  11. 4y agorsofunFortran crash guards and consistent P-model variable names
  12. 4y agorsofunPublic release following a code refactor

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between rsofun and slendr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. rsofun and slendr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is rsofun better than slendr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rsofun and slendr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to rsofun?

Top rsofun alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rsofun alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rsofun for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to slendr?

Top slendr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "slendr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/slendr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.