← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

authentik vs cofad

A side-by-side editorial comparison of authentik and cofad — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

authentik vs cofad: at a glance

Featureauthentikcofad
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesidentity-provider, enterprise-agents, endpoint-identity, oauth2contrast-analysis, factorial-designs, shiny, psychology-methods
Last editorial update2h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is authentik?

authentik 2026.8 ships: Actors, domain-joined Agents, and a push past browser-mediated SSO

2026.8.0 is out, closing a seven-candidate train that ran through early August. The GA tag itself is the last cherry-pick batch — SCIM group membership removals, a proxy redirect that preserves query strings, session deletion on user deactivation — but the release it finalizes is where the substance lives: an Actors primitive in core, an enterprise Agent requiring a domain join and its own API scope, OAuth2 token exchange delegation, and a CAS source integration.

Read the full authentik trajectory →

What is cofad?

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

Read the full cofad trajectory →

authentik vs cofad: editorial side-by-side

A
authentik
INFRA · APIS
6.3

authentik 2026.8 ships: Actors, domain-joined Agents, and a push past browser-mediated SSO

◆ Current state

2026.8.0 is out, closing a seven-candidate train that ran through early August. The GA tag itself is the last cherry-pick batch — SCIM group membership removals, a proxy redirect that preserves query strings, session deletion on user deactivation — but the release it finalizes is where the substance lives: an Actors primitive in core, an enterprise Agent requiring a domain join and its own API scope, OAuth2 token exchange delegation, and a CAS source integration.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads converge in this major. The identity surface keeps broadening at the protocol edge — CAS, WS-Fed, token exchange delegation, on-behalf-of — while the enterprise tier grows an endpoint story that reaches machines and devices rather than browser sessions. The RC train's shape reinforces it: six candidates fired in one day on CI and docs, then one heavy candidate carrying the features, then a fix-only close. That is release engineering hardened around a major, not a routine point release.

◆ Prediction

With Agents and Actors now GA rather than cherry-picks, the next branch should build out what they enable — device-conditioned policies or agent-brokered credentials — while 2026.8.x settles into backport patches.

C
cofad
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Contrast analysis with a Shiny front end, shipping about one release a year

◆ Current state

cofad performs contrast analyses for factorial designs in both between- and within-subject forms, and ships a Shiny GUI alongside the R interface. The 0.3.0 release in 2024 was the substantial one: a helper for calculating differences between two sets of lambdas for competing contrast analysis, improved summary output, removal of the plyr dependency, a rebuilt Shiny interface using standard elements after the sortable drag-and-drop proved unstable, and a change of maintainer to Johannes Titz. The most recent release is a one-line patch fixing degrees of freedom in the t-test table.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and correctness-led. The record runs from a JOSS publication in 2021 through a near three-year gap to a release that both extended the method and repaired the GUI, then a degrees-of-freedom fix. Maintainer and author order changed in 0.3.0, which typically marks a handover rather than a burst of new work, and the cadence since is consistent with that.

◆ Prediction

Expect low-frequency correctness releases; the competing contrast analysis helper added in 0.3.0 is the most likely thing to be extended if anything is.

Alternatives to authentik and cofad

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either authentik or cofad.

See all authentik alternatives → · See all cofad alternatives →

Recent activity from authentik and cofad

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoauthentikauthentik 2026.8 goes GA with Actors and domain-joined Agents
  2. 9d agoauthentikauthentik 2026.8.0-rc7 lands Actors, enterprise Agents, and CAS sources
  3. 16d agoauthentik2026.8.0-rc6: flaky test and CI metadata fixes
  4. 16d agoauthentik2026.8.0-rc5: release plumbing only
  5. 16d agoauthentik2026.8.0-rc4: fix-only candidate
  6. 16d agoauthentik2026.8.0-rc3: cherry-picked fixes and CI work
  7. 1y agocofadDegrees of freedom corrected in the t-test table
  8. 2y agocofadCompeting contrast helper, rebuilt Shiny GUI, maintainer change
  9. 4y agocofadDocumentation and references for JOSS publication
  10. 4y agocofadShiny GUI added; aggregated-data function and 0-variance fix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between authentik and cofad?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. authentik is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is authentik better than cofad?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. authentik is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to authentik?

Top authentik alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "authentik alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/authentik for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to cofad?

Top cofad alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cofad alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cofad for the full list with editorial commentary on each.