webchem
Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Athlytics and metatools — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A Strava analytics package spent its 1.0 cycle surviving rOpenSci review, not adding features.
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
SDTM supplemental-qualifier merging got sturdier, then the package went quiet for two years.
metatools provides the utilities that build and check SDTM and ADaM datasets against their metadata in the pharmaverse. The 0.1.6 release in July 2024 is the substantive one: combine_supp() learned to handle zero-row supplemental data, to refuse QNAM columns already present in the source, and to route multiple QNAM values to the same IDVAR, alongside enhanced controlled-terminology checks and record-uniqueness verification. Nothing has shipped since.
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
The package is optimising for credibility rather than surface area. It completed rOpenSci peer review, moved to an offline ZIP export workflow with hardened TCX/GPX parsing, corrected the EWMA half-life mapping, and deliberately softened its ACWR language away from injury-risk claims. Version numbers are also being published out of order, which makes the feed a poor guide to what shipped when.
With review complete and packaging metadata frozen for archival, the next substantive release is more likely to extend metric coverage or data sources than to continue polishing; nothing in these entries points to a specific new metric.
metatools provides the utilities that build and check SDTM and ADaM datasets against their metadata in the pharmaverse. The 0.1.6 release in July 2024 is the substantive one: combine_supp() learned to handle zero-row supplemental data, to refuse QNAM columns already present in the source, and to route multiple QNAM values to the same IDVAR, alongside enhanced controlled-terminology checks and record-uniqueness verification. Nothing has shipped since.
The package's development has been concentrated on one function, combine_supp(), which is where the messy realities of supplemental qualifiers surface — whitespace in join keys, empty supp datasets, colliding names. 0.1.6 also drew three first-time contributors, which is the healthiest signal in the history, but no release has followed. Sibling packages have meanwhile been dropping metatools as a dependency.
Without a release in two years the package looks stable rather than active; the plausible trigger is a controlled-terminology or dplyr change that forces the checks to be updated.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Athlytics or metatools.
Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.
The spatiotemporal companion to sf, moving at the pace of the packages around it.
An interface to Europe's long-term ecosystem research network that went quiet after 2.0.
Spatial model assessment that spent the last year on cross-platform arithmetic and CRAN rules.
Stopped trusting the cloud to prepare its taxonomic databases and does the conversion locally.
Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.
See all Athlytics alternatives → · See all metatools alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. Athlytics and metatools are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Athlytics and metatools are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top Athlytics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Athlytics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/athlytics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top metatools alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "metatools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/metatools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.