datefixR
The messy-date parser rewrote its core in Rust and came out 300x faster.
Comparison · Analytics
Athlytics vs fellingdater
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Athlytics and fellingdater — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropenscir-package
Athlytics vs fellingdater: at a glance
What is Athlytics?
A Strava analytics package spent its 1.0 cycle surviving rOpenSci review, not adding features.
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
What is fellingdater?
Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.
fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.
Athlytics vs fellingdater: editorial side-by-side
Athlytics
0.0ANALYTICS
A Strava analytics package spent its 1.0 cycle surviving rOpenSci review, not adding features.
◆ Current state
Athlytics computes endurance-training metrics — ACWR, EWMA load, efficiency factor, decoupling, personal bests — from Strava exports. Every release in view is review-driven: test-suite consolidation, dataset renames, styler passes, and a substantial robustness pass over the metric calculations and stream parsers. 1.0.6 explicitly changes nothing but packaging metadata.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is optimising for credibility rather than surface area. It completed rOpenSci peer review, moved to an offline ZIP export workflow with hardened TCX/GPX parsing, corrected the EWMA half-life mapping, and deliberately softened its ACWR language away from injury-risk claims. Version numbers are also being published out of order, which makes the feed a poor guide to what shipped when.
◆ Prediction
With review complete and packaging metadata frozen for archival, the next substantive release is more likely to extend metric coverage or data sources than to continue polishing; nothing in these entries points to a specific new metric.
fellingdater
0.0ANALYTICS
Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.
◆ Current state
fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.
◆ Prediction
Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.
Alternatives to Athlytics and fellingdater
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Athlytics or fellingdater.
maplegend
The legend engine mapsf spun out, now covering legend types the parent map package can draw.
lang
R help pages translated on demand by whichever LLM you point it at.
mapsf
Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.
qualtRics
qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.
fabletools
The tidyverts forecasting core rebuilt model combination on full residual covariance.
See all Athlytics alternatives → · See all fellingdater alternatives →
Recent activity from Athlytics and fellingdater
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoAthlyticsPackaging metadata standardised for archival
- 2mo agoAthlyticsrOpenSci peer review completed; test suite consolidated
- 2mo agoAthlyticsACWR and stream parsing corrected for real-world exports
- 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
- 6mo agoAthlyticsv1.0.2: Documentation & Review Fixes
- 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit ⚡
- 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
- 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
- 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
- 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Athlytics and fellingdater?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci, r-package — within Analytics. Athlytics and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Athlytics better than fellingdater?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Athlytics and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Athlytics?
Top Athlytics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Athlytics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/athlytics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?
Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.