← Back to home
Comparison · Meetings

Asterisk vs Microsoft Teams

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Asterisk and Microsoft Teams — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Asterisk vs Microsoft Teams: at a glance

FeatureAsteriskMicrosoft Teams
SectorMeetingsMeetings, Comms
Velocity score5.03.8
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestelephony, multi-branch-backports, security-releases, lts-maintenanceagent-governance, trust-scoring, biometric-ai, teams-admin
Last editorial update4d ago3mo ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Asterisk?

Four parallel branches, one fix set — Asterisk's changelog is a backport ledger, not a feature list.

Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.

Read the full Asterisk trajectory →

What is Microsoft Teams?

Microsoft Teams adds automated trust scoring for apps and agents in the admin center.

The standout Teams release in the recent window is the Organization Trust Score, which automates evaluation of every app and agent against admin-defined security, privacy, and compliance requirements. Adjacent to that, a new Teams Admin Center dashboard tracks voice and face profile enrollment metrics that feed AI-enhanced meeting experiences. Most other recent entries in the feed are Microsoft Learn and documentation page scrapes rather than Teams shipments.

Read the full Microsoft Teams trajectory →

Asterisk vs Microsoft Teams: editorial side-by-side

A
Asterisk
MEETINGS
5.0

Four parallel branches, one fix set — Asterisk's changelog is a backport ledger, not a feature list.

◆ Current state

Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The visible output is backport discipline rather than feature development. Release notes carry counts, tags and advisory IDs but no feature text, so the changelog reads as a stability and security ledger for a mature telephony core. The certified track deliberately lags mainline and picks up a smaller subset of each cycle.

◆ Prediction

The three release candidates should promote to final within the project's usual short RC window, with the certified branch taking the same fixes a cycle later. Nothing in these entries points to feature work in flight.

Microsoft Teams logo
Microsoft Teams
MEETINGSCOMMS
3.8

Microsoft Teams adds automated trust scoring for apps and agents in the admin center.

◆ Current state

The standout Teams release in the recent window is the Organization Trust Score, which automates evaluation of every app and agent against admin-defined security, privacy, and compliance requirements. Adjacent to that, a new Teams Admin Center dashboard tracks voice and face profile enrollment metrics that feed AI-enhanced meeting experiences. Most other recent entries in the feed are Microsoft Learn and documentation page scrapes rather than Teams shipments.

◆ Where it's heading

Teams is hardening governance for the agent and app ecosystem before pushing more agentic features into the meetings and chat surface. The pairing — automated trust scoring on the policy side, biometric enrollment visibility on the AI-meeting side — signals Microsoft's posture: AI-driven Teams capabilities will keep arriving, but admin controls land first to keep enterprise tenants comfortable saying yes.

◆ Prediction

Expect deeper extensions of Trust Score (live re-evaluation on app updates, integration with Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps) and more biometric-driven meeting capabilities like personalized noise suppression and speaker-aware transcription tied to enrolled profiles.

Alternatives to Asterisk and Microsoft Teams

Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Asterisk or Microsoft Teams.

See all Asterisk alternatives → · See all Microsoft Teams alternatives →

Recent activity from Asterisk and Microsoft Teams

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4d agoAsteriskCertified 22.8-cert4: 8 community-reported fixes
  2. 4d agoAsterisk23.5.0-rc1 opens the cycle with 27 issues resolved
  3. 4d agoAsterisk22.11.0-rc1 mirrors the 23.5.0 fix set
  4. 4d agoAsterisk20.21.0-rc1 carries the same set back to the LTS line
  5. 1mo agoAsterisk23.4.1 security release resolves 20 advisories
  6. 1mo agoAsterisk22.10.1 takes the same 20-advisory security set
  7. 3mo agoMicrosoft TeamsWe use optional cookies to improve your experience on our websites, such as through social media connections, and to display personalized advertising based on your online activity. If you reject optional cookies, only cookies necessary to provide you the services will be used. You may change your selection by clicking “Manage Cookies” at the bottom of the page. Privacy Statement Third-Party Cookie
  8. 4mo agoMicrosoft TeamsSign out
  9. 4mo agoMicrosoft TeamsVoice and face profile enrollment dashboard for admins: This feature provides admins the visibility and insight for voice and facial prof…
  10. 4mo agoMicrosoft TeamsAll product documentation Azure documentation Dynamics 365 documentation Microsoft Copilot documentation…
  11. 4mo agoMicrosoft TeamsAll training Azure training Dynamics 365 training Microsoft Copilot training Microsoft 365 tr…
  12. 4mo agoMicrosoft TeamsOrganization Trust Score automates app and agent evaluation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Asterisk and Microsoft Teams?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Asterisk is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Asterisk better than Microsoft Teams?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Asterisk is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Asterisk?

Top Asterisk alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Asterisk alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/asterisk for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Microsoft Teams?

Top Microsoft Teams alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Microsoft Teams alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/microsoft-teams for the full list with editorial commentary on each.