← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

artoo vs surveycore

A side-by-side editorial comparison of artoo and surveycore — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

artoo vs surveycore: at a glance

Featureartoosurveycore
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-packages, clinical-trials, cdisc, data-conversionsurvey-statistics, variance-estimation, replicate-weights, api-stability
Last editorial update1h ago45m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is artoo?

artoo makes any-to-any clinical dataset conversion lossless by construction.

artoo reads and writes SAS XPORT, CDISC Dataset-JSON, NDJSON, Parquet and RDS around one canonical metadata model, so a conversion between any two formats carries labels, CDISC types, lengths, display formats, controlled-terminology references and sort keys intact. It is pure R with no SAS or Java runtime. It reached CRAN at 0.1.1 and has spent 0.1.2 and 0.1.3 on the character-encoding edges.

Read the full artoo trajectory →

What is surveycore?

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

Read the full surveycore trajectory →

artoo vs surveycore: editorial side-by-side

A
artoo
INFRA · APIS
2.5

artoo makes any-to-any clinical dataset conversion lossless by construction.

◆ Current state

artoo reads and writes SAS XPORT, CDISC Dataset-JSON, NDJSON, Parquet and RDS around one canonical metadata model, so a conversion between any two formats carries labels, CDISC types, lengths, display formats, controlled-terminology references and sort keys intact. It is pure R with no SAS or Java runtime. It reached CRAN at 0.1.1 and has spent 0.1.2 and 0.1.3 on the character-encoding edges.

◆ Where it's heading

Recent work is all about text that does not survive a format change. 0.1.3 adds an invalid_encoding dimension to artoo_checks() that flags bytes which are not valid UTF-8 before a writer aborts on them, accepts the SAS OEM/DOS encoding names, and gives the writers on_invalid = "translit" and "fold" so smart punctuation and accented characters resolve to pinned ASCII instead of failing. The fold tables ship as data specifically so the result is identical on every platform, which is the same determinism argument behind C-locale row sorting in 0.1.0.

◆ Prediction

The new WLATIN1-to-UTF-8 migration article and the width warning on write_xpt() point the next attention at length and truncation semantics rather than at additional formats. These notes name no further target format.

S
surveycore
INFRA · APIS
0.0

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

◆ Current state

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

◆ Where it's heading

The last months before 1.0.0 were spent making the awkward designs behave like the ordinary ones. Non-probability designs gained jackknife replicate schemes and got their bootstrap repweights routed through the replicate-weight variance estimator in survey_glm(), matching every other estimation function. The survey_collection abstraction — several surveys treated as one pseudo-data-frame — was tightened rather than extended: divergent grouping across members now errors instead of stitching a patchwork with bind_rows(), and the missing-variable argument was renamed and given a stored default on the collection itself. A documentation audit before 1.0.0 turned up six dispatch and print bugs and corrections across forty-plus files, which is the kind of thing that surfaces when an API is being frozen rather than extended.

◆ Prediction

A declared-stable API means the next releases should be additive or corrective rather than breaking, and the pre-1.0.0 pattern of breaking renames should stop. The tight version pinning between the two packages means surveytidy releases will keep following surveycore's.

Alternatives to artoo and surveycore

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either artoo or surveycore.

See all artoo alternatives → · See all surveycore alternatives →

Recent activity from artoo and surveycore

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 28d agoartooEncoding checks and translit/fold modes for the writers
  2. 1mo agoartoonoLD check fix; codec unchanged
  3. 2mo agoartooInitial CRAN release after resubmission
  4. 2mo agoartooLossless any-to-any CDISC dataset conversion in pure R
  5. 2mo agosurveycoreFirst stable release: all four survey design types complete
  6. 3mo agosurveycoreget_effective_n() computes effective sample size
  7. 3mo agosurveycoreCollections error on divergent grouping; .on_missing renamed
  8. 4mo agosurveycoreCRAN patch removing surveytidy from the vignette

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between artoo and surveycore?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. artoo is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is artoo better than surveycore?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. artoo is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to artoo?

Top artoo alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "artoo alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/artoo for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to surveycore?

Top surveycore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveycore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveycore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.