← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

mpactr vs surveycore

A side-by-side editorial comparison of mpactr and surveycore — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packages

mpactr vs surveycore: at a glance

Featurempactrsurveycore
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmetabolomics, mass-spectrometry, peak-filtering, data-importsurvey-statistics, variance-estimation, replicate-weights, api-stability
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is mpactr?

mpactr spent two spring releases normalizing case in metadata after users kept tripping on it.

mpactr filters mass-spectrometry peak tables — removing contaminants, ion duplicates and low-reproducibility features before downstream metabolomics analysis — with a data.table and Rcpp core. Development is slow and the recent releases are small. The May pair both address the same friction: column names and imported table names arriving in inconsistent case and failing to match.

Read the full mpactr trajectory →

What is surveycore?

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

Read the full surveycore trajectory →

mpactr vs surveycore: editorial side-by-side

M
mpactr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

mpactr spent two spring releases normalizing case in metadata after users kept tripping on it.

◆ Current state

mpactr filters mass-spectrometry peak tables — removing contaminants, ion duplicates and low-reproducibility features before downstream metabolomics analysis — with a data.table and Rcpp core. Development is slow and the recent releases are small. The May pair both address the same friction: column names and imported table names arriving in inconsistent case and failing to match.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is stabilizing its input contract rather than growing its filtering methods. Metadata column names are now forced lowercase inside import_data() regardless of how the file was written, imported peak_tables names not present in the injection column are lowercased too, and get_meta_data() was renamed to get_metadata() in the same pass. Before that the work was infrastructural — Rcpp introduced to speed up filtering, data.table moved from Depends to Imports, and memory errors cleared so the package passes Valgrind and both sanitizers. Note the earliest entry compares against a v1.0.0 tag that precedes 0.1.0 in the repository, so version ordering in this feed is not reliable.

◆ Prediction

The case-normalization work has now touched both metadata columns and peak table names across two consecutive releases, which suggests the input-matching problem is not fully closed and a third pass is plausible. Nothing in these entries points to new filtering methods.

S
surveycore
INFRA · APIS
0.0

surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.

◆ Current state

surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.

◆ Where it's heading

The last months before 1.0.0 were spent making the awkward designs behave like the ordinary ones. Non-probability designs gained jackknife replicate schemes and got their bootstrap repweights routed through the replicate-weight variance estimator in survey_glm(), matching every other estimation function. The survey_collection abstraction — several surveys treated as one pseudo-data-frame — was tightened rather than extended: divergent grouping across members now errors instead of stitching a patchwork with bind_rows(), and the missing-variable argument was renamed and given a stored default on the collection itself. A documentation audit before 1.0.0 turned up six dispatch and print bugs and corrections across forty-plus files, which is the kind of thing that surfaces when an API is being frozen rather than extended.

◆ Prediction

A declared-stable API means the next releases should be additive or corrective rather than breaking, and the pre-1.0.0 pattern of breaking renames should stop. The tight version pinning between the two packages means surveytidy releases will keep following surveycore's.

Alternatives to mpactr and surveycore

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mpactr or surveycore.

See all mpactr alternatives → · See all surveycore alternatives →

Recent activity from mpactr and surveycore

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agosurveycoreFirst stable release: all four survey design types complete
  2. 3mo agompactrPeak table names lowercased when absent from the injection column
  3. 3mo agompactrMetadata column names forced lowercase; get_metadata() renamed
  4. 3mo agosurveycoreget_effective_n() computes effective sample size
  5. 3mo agosurveycoreCollections error on divergent grouping; .on_missing renamed
  6. 4mo agosurveycoreCRAN patch removing surveytidy from the vignette
  7. 10mo agompactrValgrind and sanitizer memory issues cleared
  8. 1y agompactrRcpp added to speed up filtering; data.table moved to Imports
  9. 1y agompactrmpactr 0.1.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between mpactr and surveycore?

Both compete on the same themes — r-packages — within Infra & APIs. mpactr and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is mpactr better than surveycore?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mpactr and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to mpactr?

Top mpactr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mpactr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mpactr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to surveycore?

Top surveycore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveycore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveycore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.