tidyr
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
Comparison · Analytics
Apache TsFile vs performance
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Apache TsFile and performance — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Apache TsFile vs performance: at a glance
What is Apache TsFile?
TsFile is quietly rebuilding itself as an Arrow-speaking interchange format
Apache TsFile is the columnar time-series file format underlying IoTDB, maintained as three parallel implementations in Java, C++ and Python. Recent releases have concentrated on the C++ and Python ends: SIMD paths and parallel reads in 2.4.0, an Arrow-compatible result path from C++ through to Python DataFrames in 2.3.0, and conversion scripts from CSV, Parquet and Arrow into TsFile in 2.3.1. The Java side gets steadier, smaller work — serialized-size calculation, schema modification during writes, encryption configuration.
What is performance?
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.
Apache TsFile vs performance: editorial side-by-side
Apache TsFile
2.5ANALYTICS
TsFile is quietly rebuilding itself as an Arrow-speaking interchange format
◆ Current state
Apache TsFile is the columnar time-series file format underlying IoTDB, maintained as three parallel implementations in Java, C++ and Python. Recent releases have concentrated on the C++ and Python ends: SIMD paths and parallel reads in 2.4.0, an Arrow-compatible result path from C++ through to Python DataFrames in 2.3.0, and conversion scripts from CSV, Parquet and Arrow into TsFile in 2.3.1. The Java side gets steadier, smaller work — serialized-size calculation, schema modification during writes, encryption configuration.
◆ Where it's heading
The centre of gravity has moved from format features to ecosystem reach. Arrow-backed DataFrames and format converters are not about storing time series better; they are about making TsFile readable by the Python analytics stack without a translation layer, which is the gap that keeps a specialized format confined to its own database. The C++ performance work in 2.4.0 serves the same end, since the Python bindings sit on top of it. Version numbering runs on two lines at once, with 1.1.x backports still shipping alongside the 2.x series.
◆ Prediction
Given the direction of the Arrow work, the Python interface is the most likely target for further capability rather than the Java one. The notes do not indicate when the 1.1 maintenance line ends.
performance
0.0ANALYTICS
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
◆ Current state
performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.
◆ Where it's heading
Two consistent habits. Diagnostics keep gaining arguments to narrow what is examined — ppc_range, x_limits, maximum_dots, show_ci — which reads as a package being used on models large and awkward enough that the defaults stopped working. And simulated residuals via DHARMa keep displacing standard ones as the basis for the checks themselves.
◆ Prediction
With check_priors() newly added and Bayesian predictive checks now routed through modelbased, the next release most likely extends the Bayesian diagnostic set rather than reworking the frequentist checks.
Alternatives to Apache TsFile and performance
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Apache TsFile or performance.
modeltime
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
cmdstanpy
CmdStanPy is clearing deprecations ahead of a 2.0 it keeps announcing.
dowhy
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
See all Apache TsFile alternatives → · See all performance alternatives →
Recent activity from Apache TsFile and performance
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 20d agoApache TsFileSIMD and parallel read paths in Apache TsFile 2.4.0
- 1mo agoperformancecheck_priors() added; overdispersion plots use simulated residuals
- 2mo agoApache TsFileCSV, Parquet and Arrow conversion scripts for TsFile 2.3.1
- 2mo agoperformance-2LL criterion column and unified Bayesian predictive checks
- 3mo agoApache TsFileArrow-backed DataFrames and paginated reads in TsFile 2.3.0
- 3mo agoApache TsFileWrite-time schema changes and read/write encryption in TsFile 2.2.1
- 6mo agoperformanceBreaking renames plus point-count and CI controls in check_model()
- 7mo agoApache TsFilePython text types and C++ tag filtering in TsFile 2.2.0
- 7mo agoApache TsFileBackport maintenance on the TsFile 1.1 line
- 8mo agoperformancecheck_autocorrelation() methods for DHARMa objects
- 10mo agoperformanceFixes CRAN checks after an rstanarm update
- 11mo agoperformancetinytable output format in display()
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Apache TsFile and performance?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Apache TsFile is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Apache TsFile better than performance?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Apache TsFile is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Apache TsFile?
Top Apache TsFile alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Apache TsFile alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/apache-tsfile for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to performance?
Top performance alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "performance alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/easystats-performance for the full list with editorial commentary on each.