rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
anticlust vs prova
A side-by-side editorial comparison of anticlust and prova — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
anticlust vs prova: at a glance
What is anticlust?
Anticlustering keeps absorbing constraints — must-link, cannot-link, blocks, missing data
anticlust partitions a set of items into groups that are as similar to each other as possible — assembling matched stimulus sets, balanced experimental conditions, comparable teaching groups. The current surface is one function, anticlustering(), with a growing list of things it will honour: must-link and cannot-link constraints, categorical variables as factors, NAs, blocking by a categorical level, and a choice among exact solvers and heuristics.
What is prova?
prova adds expected-utility calculation on top of its Bayesian inference core.
prova does Bayesian nonparametric inference in R — probabilities through Pr() and qPr(), mutual information, quantile plots. Five releases in about two weeks renamed its central argument, collapsed two plotting functions into one, and then in v2.3.0 introduced exputility() for expected utilities and their revisability, with plot() and print() methods attached from the start.
anticlust vs prova: editorial side-by-side
anticlust
0.0INFRA · APIS
Anticlustering keeps absorbing constraints — must-link, cannot-link, blocks, missing data
◆ Current state
anticlust partitions a set of items into groups that are as similar to each other as possible — assembling matched stimulus sets, balanced experimental conditions, comparable teaching groups. The current surface is one function, anticlustering(), with a growing list of things it will honour: must-link and cannot-link constraints, categorical variables as factors, NAs, blocking by a categorical level, and a choice among exact solvers and heuristics.
◆ Where it's heading
Two years of releases have gone almost entirely into constraint handling and input tolerance rather than new objectives. The methods list grew by absorbing outside work — the three-phase search of Yang et al. contributed by an external author, a 2PML heuristic for must-link problems, a Gurobi backend for the exact formulations. Meanwhile categories_to_binary() has been rewritten twice, which is where the recent bugs have come from.
◆ Prediction
The constraint types now interact combinatorially — blocks, must-link, cannot-link, missing values and each objective — and the last two releases were both regressions in the encoding layer underneath them. Consolidating that layer is the more likely next move than another solver.
prova
6.3INFRA · APIS
prova adds expected-utility calculation on top of its Bayesian inference core.
◆ Current state
prova does Bayesian nonparametric inference in R — probabilities through Pr() and qPr(), mutual information, quantile plots. Five releases in about two weeks renamed its central argument, collapsed two plotting functions into one, and then in v2.3.0 introduced exputility() for expected utilities and their revisability, with plot() and print() methods attached from the start.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in parallel. One compresses the API: learnt= became K=, flexiplot() and plotquantiles() merged into pplot(), and omitting arguments such as Y=, X= and K= got simpler. The other extends reach — mutualinfoF() for finite-domain variates, quantile accuracy reported alongside mutual information, and now a decision-theoretic layer sitting on the inference the package already did.
◆ Prediction
exputility() shipping with print() and plot() methods matches how the probability and mutual-information classes were treated, so utilities are likely to get the same class-based handling as they mature. The notes do not say whether decision analysis extends beyond expected utility.
Alternatives to anticlust and prova
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either anticlust or prova.
massProps
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
See all anticlust alternatives → · See all prova alternatives →
Recent activity from anticlust and prova
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 13d agoprovaexputility() brings decision analysis into prova ⚡
- 20d agoprovaCumulative 2.x notes, plus hist() and mutual-information changes
- 23d agoprovalearnt= becomes K=; pplot() replaces two plot functions
- 28d agoprovaFix for pre-existing parallel clusters
- 28d agoprovaextraDistr dropped; mutual-information objects get a class
- 4mo agoanticlustOne-hot encoding regression from 0.8.13 reverted
- 8mo agoanticlustblocks argument applies anticlustering level by level
- 9mo agoanticlustMissing values, factor columns, and the three-phase search
- 1y agoanticlustEdge cases in the previous release's cannot-link handling
- 1y agoanticlustVector cannot-link constraints skip the solver entirely
- 1y agoanticlustUncaught test error flagged by CRAN additional checks
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between anticlust and prova?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. prova is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is anticlust better than prova?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. prova is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to anticlust?
Top anticlust alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "anticlust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/anticlust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to prova?
Top prova alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "prova alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/prova for the full list with editorial commentary on each.