rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
anticlust vs checkhelper
A side-by-side editorial comparison of anticlust and checkhelper — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
anticlust vs checkhelper: at a glance
What is anticlust?
Anticlustering keeps absorbing constraints — must-link, cannot-link, blocks, missing data
anticlust partitions a set of items into groups that are as similar to each other as possible — assembling matched stimulus sets, balanced experimental conditions, comparable teaching groups. The current surface is one function, anticlustering(), with a growing list of things it will honour: must-link and cannot-link constraints, categorical variables as factors, NAs, blocking by a categorical level, and a choice among exact solvers and heuristics.
What is checkhelper?
checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.
1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.
anticlust vs checkhelper: editorial side-by-side
anticlust
0.0INFRA · APIS
Anticlustering keeps absorbing constraints — must-link, cannot-link, blocks, missing data
◆ Current state
anticlust partitions a set of items into groups that are as similar to each other as possible — assembling matched stimulus sets, balanced experimental conditions, comparable teaching groups. The current surface is one function, anticlustering(), with a growing list of things it will honour: must-link and cannot-link constraints, categorical variables as factors, NAs, blocking by a categorical level, and a choice among exact solvers and heuristics.
◆ Where it's heading
Two years of releases have gone almost entirely into constraint handling and input tolerance rather than new objectives. The methods list grew by absorbing outside work — the three-phase search of Yang et al. contributed by an external author, a 2PML heuristic for must-link problems, a Gurobi backend for the exact formulations. Meanwhile categories_to_binary() has been rewritten twice, which is where the recent bugs have come from.
◆ Prediction
The constraint types now interact combinatorially — blocks, must-link, cannot-link, missing values and each objective — and the last two releases were both regressions in the encoding layer underneath them. Consolidating that layer is the more likely next move than another solver.
checkhelper
2.5INFRA · APIS
checkhelper grew from a check wrapper into a CRAN pre-submission auditor.
◆ Current state
1.0.0 added a whole audit_* family — audit_downloads(), audit_description(), audit_dontrun() and audit_citation() — each parsing package source statically and returning a tibble of hits paired with a suggested fix. The package is now defending that position: 1.0.1 rc1 is a submission candidate answering a CRAN archival notice, after roxygen2 8.x moved DESCRIPTION's RoxygenNote field and broke a find_missing_tags() test fixture.
◆ Where it's heading
The design commitment is static analysis — AST walks via getParseData(), line-by-line Rd reading, no eval() and no namespace loading — so the tool can report on a package it never runs. That commitment is what made the roxygen2 8.x break survivable: the audit pipeline itself was verified correct under 8.1.0 and only the test scaffolding had to go, now guarded by a dedicated regression test. fix_globals(write = TRUE) is being sanded down in parallel, no longer flattening per-function grouping comments or writing a degenerate empty globalVariables() shell.
◆ Prediction
The immediate move is the 1.0.1 submission itself, clearing the archival notice. Beyond that, each additional CRAN incoming-check rule remains a candidate for another audit_* function; the open question these notes still leave is whether the family ever gets a single combined entry point.
Alternatives to anticlust and checkhelper
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either anticlust or checkhelper.
massProps
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
See all anticlust alternatives → · See all checkhelper alternatives →
Recent activity from anticlust and checkhelper
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agocheckhelpercheckhelper 1.0.1 rc1 (CRAN submission candidate)
- 3mo agocheckhelperA static audit_* family for CRAN pre-submission checks ⚡
- 4mo agoanticlustOne-hot encoding regression from 0.8.13 reverted
- 8mo agoanticlustblocks argument applies anticlustering level by level
- 9mo agoanticlustMissing values, factor columns, and the three-phase search
- 1y agoanticlustEdge cases in the previous release's cannot-link handling
- 1y agoanticlustVector cannot-link constraints skip the solver entirely
- 1y agoanticlustUncaught test error flagged by CRAN additional checks
- 2y agocheckhelperTest fixes for roxygen2 changes
- 3y agocheckhelpercheckhelper 0.1.0 - First CRAN Release
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between anticlust and checkhelper?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is anticlust better than checkhelper?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. checkhelper is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to anticlust?
Top anticlust alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "anticlust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/anticlust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to checkhelper?
Top checkhelper alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "checkhelper alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/checkhelper for the full list with editorial commentary on each.