Restream
Restream is building the production desk and the clip factory at the same time
Comparison · Meetings
Ant Media Server vs Asterisk
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Ant Media Server and Asterisk — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Ant Media Server vs Asterisk: at a glance
What is Ant Media Server?
Ant Media crossed the 3.0 line with AV1, eight CVE patches, and a breaking API cleanup.
Ant Media Server has just shipped its 3.0 series. The cut version, 3.0.1, packed an AV1 codec path, removed long-deprecated methods (potentially breaking integrations), patched roughly eight CVEs in the parent and management console, and added Strict-Transport-Security headers and daily SSL renewal checks. Two follow-up tags (3.0.2, 3.0.3) appear to be quick rebuilds rather than feature releases. The recent 2.17.x line had introduced server-side ad insertion (SSAI with SCTE-35), a v2 WebRTC web SDK, and LL-HLS cluster play.
What is Asterisk?
Four parallel branches, one fix set — Asterisk's changelog is a backport ledger, not a feature list.
Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.
Ant Media Server vs Asterisk: editorial side-by-side
Ant Media Server
6.3MEETINGS
Ant Media crossed the 3.0 line with AV1, eight CVE patches, and a breaking API cleanup.
◆ Current state
Ant Media Server has just shipped its 3.0 series. The cut version, 3.0.1, packed an AV1 codec path, removed long-deprecated methods (potentially breaking integrations), patched roughly eight CVEs in the parent and management console, and added Strict-Transport-Security headers and daily SSL renewal checks. Two follow-up tags (3.0.2, 3.0.3) appear to be quick rebuilds rather than feature releases. The recent 2.17.x line had introduced server-side ad insertion (SSAI with SCTE-35), a v2 WebRTC web SDK, and LL-HLS cluster play.
◆ Where it's heading
The product is in a 'broadcaster-grade plus security hardening' arc. SSAI/SCTE-35 is a clear push toward live-event monetization use cases, while AV1 and v2 WebRTC SDK target streaming infrastructure that competes with managed services. The CVE volume across recent releases (2.16.2 was nothing but patches; 2.17.1 and 3.0.1 each carried multiple) suggests an active third-party security review or fuzzing program is feeding the queue.
◆ Prediction
Expect 3.0.x point releases focused on stabilizing AV1 in production, mopping up regressions from the deprecated-method removals, and continued CVE patching. The next functional bet to watch is whether SSAI gets enterprise-grade analytics or whether AV1 gets hardware-accelerated encode paths.
Asterisk
5.0MEETINGS
Four parallel branches, one fix set — Asterisk's changelog is a backport ledger, not a feature list.
◆ Current state
Asterisk maintains mainline 20, 22 and 23 branches alongside a certified track, and lands each fix set across all of them at once. The June 25 batch was a coordinated security release resolving roughly 20 advisories on every branch simultaneously. The August 7 batch opens the next cycle with release candidates carrying identical commit, author and issue counts across 23.5.0, 22.11.0 and 20.21.0.
◆ Where it's heading
The visible output is backport discipline rather than feature development. Release notes carry counts, tags and advisory IDs but no feature text, so the changelog reads as a stability and security ledger for a mature telephony core. The certified track deliberately lags mainline and picks up a smaller subset of each cycle.
◆ Prediction
The three release candidates should promote to final within the project's usual short RC window, with the certified branch taking the same fixes a cycle later. Nothing in these entries points to feature work in flight.
Alternatives to Ant Media Server and Asterisk
Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Ant Media Server or Asterisk.
Webex
The feed is a marketing blog; the actual GA announcements arrive between the thought leadership
HOMER
HOMER 11's DuckLake rearchitecture is in its hardening phase, shipping near-daily.
mediasoup
mediasoup's Rust line is shipping subchannel fixes every few days and nothing else
Daily.co
One real release is buried in a feed that is mostly captured page furniture.
Fourwaves
A daily drip of conference-platform polish, with finance filtering and attendee self-service leading.
See all Ant Media Server alternatives → · See all Asterisk alternatives →
Recent activity from Ant Media Server and Asterisk
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4d agoAsteriskCertified 22.8-cert4: 8 community-reported fixes
- 4d agoAsterisk23.5.0-rc1 opens the cycle with 27 issues resolved
- 4d agoAsterisk22.11.0-rc1 mirrors the 23.5.0 fix set
- 4d agoAsterisk20.21.0-rc1 carries the same set back to the LTS line
- 1mo agoAsterisk23.4.1 security release resolves 20 advisories
- 1mo agoAsterisk22.10.1 takes the same 20-advisory security set
- 3mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.3: rebuild tag with no published changelog
- 3mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.2: SNAPSHOT version bump and quality items
- 3mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 3.0.1: AV1 codec, breaking API cleanup, eight CVE patches ⚡
- 6mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.17.1: WebRTC timing fixes, SRT restream endpoints, local license server
- 6mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.17.0: SSAI with SCTE-35 and WebRTC Web SDK v2 ⚡
- 8mo agoAnt Media ServerCommunity 2.16.2: five CVE patches in the parent
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Ant Media Server and Asterisk?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Ant Media Server is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Ant Media Server better than Asterisk?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Ant Media Server is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Ant Media Server?
Top Ant Media Server alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Ant Media Server alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ant-media for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Asterisk?
Top Asterisk alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Asterisk alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/asterisk for the full list with editorial commentary on each.