Calibre
Calibre MCP lets your coding agent read RUM and Lighthouse data, then fix the slow code
Comparison · Analytics
Amundsen vs Glances
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Amundsen and Glances — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Amundsen vs Glances: at a glance
What is Amundsen?
Amundsen's last release was a config flag, and the feed has been silent for two years
Amundsen ships as several separately versioned components — databuilder, metadata, frontend, common — cut from one repository, and the release feed shows the same changelog republished under three different component tags on the same afternoon. Reading past the tag names, the content is overwhelmingly dependabot bumps, Python compatibility-matrix maintenance and mypy upgrades, with real features appearing a couple of times a year. The final release, databuilder 7.5.1 in August 2024, contains exactly one change: a config option for implicit transactions in the neo4j extractor.
What is Glances?
Glances 4.5.9 closes out the 4.x line as a 5.0 beta opens for testing.
Glances 4.5.9 replaces the python-jose library, which carried a CVE, with PyJWT and updates every dependency. The notes say it is the last 4.x release and point users to a Glances 5.0.0 beta on Test PyPI and a dev Docker image. Most 4.5 releases this year were security and correctness fixes.
Amundsen vs Glances: editorial side-by-side
Amundsen
0.0ANALYTICS
Amundsen's last release was a config flag, and the feed has been silent for two years
◆ Current state
Amundsen ships as several separately versioned components — databuilder, metadata, frontend, common — cut from one repository, and the release feed shows the same changelog republished under three different component tags on the same afternoon. Reading past the tag names, the content is overwhelmingly dependabot bumps, Python compatibility-matrix maintenance and mypy upgrades, with real features appearing a couple of times a year. The final release, databuilder 7.5.1 in August 2024, contains exactly one change: a config option for implicit transactions in the neo4j extractor.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is contraction. Python 3.7 support was dropped and the matrix narrowed to 3.8 and 3.9 before 3.10 was cautiously added to everything except the metadata service, contributor names moved to emeritus status, and organisations were removed from the README's adopter list. What feature work exists is small and peripheral — a PowerBI logo, aggregated alerts, a gremlin proxy method — rather than anything touching how the catalog works. Nothing has been published since August 2024.
◆ Prediction
There is no signal in these entries of planned work, and a two-year silence following a single-flag release means the practical expectation is no further releases; the component version skew across databuilder, metadata and frontend is now frozen where it stopped.
Glances
5.0ANALYTICS
Glances 4.5.9 closes out the 4.x line as a 5.0 beta opens for testing.
◆ Current state
Glances 4.5.9 replaces the python-jose library, which carried a CVE, with PyJWT and updates every dependency. The notes say it is the last 4.x release and point users to a Glances 5.0.0 beta on Test PyPI and a dev Docker image. Most 4.5 releases this year were security and correctness fixes.
◆ Where it's heading
After a year of CVE patches and alert correctness work on 4.5, the project is ending the 4.x line and moving to 5.0. The feed does not yet describe what changes in 5.0.
◆ Prediction
Expect further 5.0 betas and then a 5.0.0 release; whether it changes the plugin model, web UI or API is not visible in these entries.
Alternatives to Amundsen and Glances
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Amundsen or Glances.
Dovetail
Dovetail opens its docs to Claude and ChatGPT as co-authors.
Apache SkyWalking
SkyWalking 11.1 builds service maps from OpenTelemetry traces, no SkyWalking agent required.
OpenReplay
OpenReplay's feed is Helm chart bumps behind its asset-cacher deny list.
Tinybird
Tinybird shrinks its Local image by a third after a run of observability updates.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse tightens view authorization and moves its optimizer schema to Flyway.
See all Amundsen alternatives → · See all Glances alternatives →
Recent activity from Amundsen and Glances
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoGlancesGlances 4.5.9
- 29d agoGlancesGlances 4.5.8
- 29d agoGlancesPre-cutover tag before the v4 migration
- 1mo agoGlancesGlances 4.5.7 fixes dozens of wrong or silent alerts
- 3mo agoGlancesCredential leak via URL values in /api/4/config
- 4mo agoGlancesContainer API latency, ARM GPU monitoring, AMP command-execution fix
- 2y agoAmundsenDatabuilder 7.5.1 adds implicit-transaction config for the neo4j extractor
- 2y agoAmundsenDatabuilder 7.5.0 is dependency bumps and a Python 3.10 matrix
- 2y agoAmundsenMetadata 3.13.0 adds aggregating alerts and a gremlin proxy lookup
- 2y agoAmundsenFrontend 4.3.0 republishes the same changelog under a second tag
- 2y agoAmundsenCommon 0.32.0 republishes the same changelog under a third tag
- 2y agoAmundsenMetadata 3.12.3 clears frontend dependency vulnerabilities
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Amundsen and Glances?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Glances is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Amundsen better than Glances?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Glances is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Amundsen?
Top Amundsen alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Amundsen alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/amundsen for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Glances?
Top Glances alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Glances alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glances for the full list with editorial commentary on each.