bittermelon
bittermelon is growing from binary bitmaps toward greyscale and color glyphs
Comparison · Analytics
affiner vs spatstat.geom
A side-by-side editorial comparison of affiner and spatstat.geom — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-packagecomputational-geometry
affiner vs spatstat.geom: at a glance
What is affiner?
affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.
An R package that began as a wrapper around grid's affine transformation primitives, with an angle vector class supporting degrees, radians, half-turns, turns and gradians so users need not convert by hand. Four releases in roughly eighteen months. The recent two have expanded well past that starting point into geometric objects and the predicates that operate on them.
What is spatstat.geom?
The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics
spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.
affiner vs spatstat.geom: editorial side-by-side
affiner
0.0ANALYTICS
affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.
◆ Current state
An R package that began as a wrapper around grid's affine transformation primitives, with an angle vector class supporting degrees, radians, half-turns, turns and gradians so users need not convert by hand. Four releases in roughly eighteen months. The recent two have expanded well past that starting point into geometric objects and the predicates that operate on them.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is clear from the order things arrived. Version 0.2.1 added the predicate layer first — has_intersection(), intersection(), is_equivalent() and is_parallel() as S3 generics working across angle vectors, points, lines and planes. Version 0.3.1 then supplied the objects those generics need, with Ellipse2D, Polygon2D and Segment2D R6 classes plus constructors for rectangles, regular n-gons and isotoxal star polygons, and dot products at one, two and three dimensions. Building the operations before the shapes is unusual ordering but it means each new object type arrives already composable with everything else.
◆ Prediction
Expect more 2D and 3D object types filling out the same generic interface, and the geometry side to keep outgrowing the grid-transformation wrapper the package was named for.
spatstat.geom
2.5ANALYTICS
The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics
◆ Current state
spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through this window. The first is a family-wide push into 3D that originated in the simulation package and has now reached the geometry layer. The second is a slower semantic change: 3.5-0 introduced missing or unavailable (NA) spatial objects, and 3.6-0 followed with more facilities for handling them, meaning an absent window or image became a representable value rather than an error. Around both, the plotting and discretisation code accretes steadily — nonlinear colour maps, plot backgrounds, transparency control, signed distance transforms, and repeated attention to boundary pixels.
◆ Prediction
Expect the 3D surface here to keep filling in behind the simulation package rather than leading it, given that 3.8-2 follows the 3D simulation release by two months. The entries give no indication that the NA work is finished, since it has already spanned two releases.
Alternatives to affiner and spatstat.geom
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either affiner or spatstat.geom.
epiworldR
epiworldR is a thin R shell whose releases track the C++ simulator underneath it
watina
A groundwater database client that has started doing the domain analysis too
inbospatial
A thin R wrapper over Flemish geospatial services, adding one standard at a time
Fluent Bit
Fluent Bit keeps two lines alive while the 5.x branch quietly opens 5.1.
OpenCTI
OpenCTI is rebuilding its connector layer into a marketplace and wiring the platform to XTM Hub
See all affiner alternatives → · See all spatstat.geom alternatives →
Recent activity from affiner and spatstat.geom
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 20d agospatstat.geomMore three-dimensional point pattern capabilities
- 2mo agospatstat.geomBetter boundary pixel handling when discretising windows
- 3mo agoaffinerEllipse, polygon and segment objects, with star and n-gon constructors
- 6mo agospatstat.geomAnalytic level sets and signed distance transforms
- 6mo agoaffinerIntersection, equivalence and parallelism generics across geometric types
- 10mo agospatstat.geomNA object handling extended; clickpoly gains grid snapping
- 1y agospatstat.geomNA spatial objects, hole removal and connected components
- 1y agospatstat.geomNonlinear colour and symbol maps; half-open quadrat tiles
- 1y agoaffinerIsocube border fill forced transparent
- 1y agoaffinerInitial release: affine grob wrappers and multi-unit angle vectors
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between affiner and spatstat.geom?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package, computational-geometry — within Analytics. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is affiner better than spatstat.geom?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to affiner?
Top affiner alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "affiner alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/affiner-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to spatstat.geom?
Top spatstat.geom alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.geom alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-geom for the full list with editorial commentary on each.