← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

affiner vs modeltime.resample

A side-by-side editorial comparison of affiner and modeltime.resample — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

affiner vs modeltime.resample: at a glance

Featureaffinermodeltime.resample
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, computational-geometry, grid-graphics, affine-transformstime series, cross-validation, tidymodels, compatibility maintenance
Last editorial update1h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is affiner?

affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.

An R package that began as a wrapper around grid's affine transformation primitives, with an angle vector class supporting degrees, radians, half-turns, turns and gradians so users need not convert by hand. Four releases in roughly eighteen months. The recent two have expanded well past that starting point into geometric objects and the predicates that operate on them.

Read the full affiner trajectory →

What is modeltime.resample?

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

Read the full modeltime.resample trajectory →

affiner vs modeltime.resample: editorial side-by-side

A
affiner
ANALYTICS
0.0

affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.

◆ Current state

An R package that began as a wrapper around grid's affine transformation primitives, with an angle vector class supporting degrees, radians, half-turns, turns and gradians so users need not convert by hand. Four releases in roughly eighteen months. The recent two have expanded well past that starting point into geometric objects and the predicates that operate on them.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is clear from the order things arrived. Version 0.2.1 added the predicate layer first — has_intersection(), intersection(), is_equivalent() and is_parallel() as S3 generics working across angle vectors, points, lines and planes. Version 0.3.1 then supplied the objects those generics need, with Ellipse2D, Polygon2D and Segment2D R6 classes plus constructors for rectangles, regular n-gons and isotoxal star polygons, and dot products at one, two and three dimensions. Building the operations before the shapes is unusual ordering but it means each new object type arrives already composable with everything else.

◆ Prediction

Expect more 2D and 3D object types filling out the same generic interface, and the geometry side to keep outgrowing the grid-transformation wrapper the package was named for.

M0.0

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

◆ Current state

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

◆ Where it's heading

Every entry here is compatibility work against something upstream — hardhat 1.0.0, workflows regression mode, then tune 2.0.0 twice. The 0.3.0 notes show a second concern emerging alongside it: making failures legible, with .notes on failed fits, actionable errors from unnest_modeltime_resamples(), and fallback logic when prediction columns go missing across versions. Reproducibility gets the same treatment through explicit seeding.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the next tidymodels breaking change, with any new work continuing on error reporting rather than resampling strategies.

Alternatives to affiner and modeltime.resample

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either affiner or modeltime.resample.

See all affiner alternatives → · See all modeltime.resample alternatives →

Recent activity from affiner and modeltime.resample

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agoaffinerEllipse, polygon and segment objects, with star and n-gon constructors
  2. 6mo agoaffinerIntersection, equivalence and parallelism generics across geometric types
  3. 11mo agomodeltime.resampletune 2.0 support, deterministic seeding, clearer errors
  4. 11mo agomodeltime.resampleDependency cleanup ahead of the next tune release
  5. 1y agoaffinerIsocube border fill forced transparent
  6. 1y agoaffinerInitial release: affine grob wrappers and multi-unit angle vectors
  7. 3y agomodeltime.resampleFixes workflows in regression mode
  8. 4y agomodeltime.resampleUpdates for hardhat 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between affiner and modeltime.resample?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. affiner and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is affiner better than modeltime.resample?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. affiner and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to affiner?

Top affiner alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "affiner alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/affiner-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.resample?

Top modeltime.resample alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.resample alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-resample for the full list with editorial commentary on each.