excluder
A Qualtrics data-cleaning package that has been in maintenance mode since its CRAN acceptance.
Comparison · Analytics
admiralophtha vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of admiralophtha and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
admiralophtha vs webmockr: at a glance
What is admiralophtha?
Ophthalmology ADaM support is migrating its derivations upstream into admiral core.
admiralophtha supplies ophthalmology-specific ADaM templates and vignettes — ADBCVA, ADOE, ADVFQ — on top of admiral. Releases arrive roughly twice a year and are dominated by template and vignette modernisation plus a long, deliberate deprecation of the package's own criterion-flag helper in favour of admiral::derive_vars_crit_flag(). The 1.5.0 release advances that deprecation to its warning phase and adds a template explorer.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
admiralophtha vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
admiralophtha
0.0ANALYTICS
Ophthalmology ADaM support is migrating its derivations upstream into admiral core.
◆ Current state
admiralophtha supplies ophthalmology-specific ADaM templates and vignettes — ADBCVA, ADOE, ADVFQ — on top of admiral. Releases arrive roughly twice a year and are dominated by template and vignette modernisation plus a long, deliberate deprecation of the package's own criterion-flag helper in favour of admiral::derive_vars_crit_flag(). The 1.5.0 release advances that deprecation to its warning phase and adds a template explorer.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc is consolidation: functions the package invented are being retired as admiral core grows generic equivalents, leaving admiralophtha as the place where ophthalmology conventions are documented. Recent releases spend their weight on templates and vignettes — VFQ guidance alignment, IOP parameter mapping, subject-key options — rather than new exported code. Deprecations are run on a fixed six-month, one-release-per-phase clock, which makes the migration path unusually legible.
◆ Prediction
derive_var_bcvacritxfl() should reach its error phase and then removal over the next two releases, with the accompanying work being ADBCVA vignette and template edits rather than new functions.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to admiralophtha and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either admiralophtha or webmockr.
geotargets
Geospatial targets grew from two raster helpers into a tiling and multi-backend pipeline layer.
forcis
A foraminifera data-access package whose entire release history is the rOpenSci review process.
daiquiri
A data-quality report generator that finished its API rewrite and has been coasting on small features since.
r2rtf
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
DoseFinding
New stewardship at openpharma, then two releases adding the methods MCP-Mod was missing
See all admiralophtha alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from admiralophtha and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoadmiralophthaCriterion-flag deprecation reaches its warning phase
- 7mo agoadmiralophthaCriterion-flag deprecation starts; ADVFQ template modernised
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agoadmiralophthaADBCVA and ADOE templates show richer derivation patterns
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 1y agoadmiralophthaCriterion flags switch to the generic admiral helper
- 1y agoadmiralophthaderive_var_afeye() arguments enter final deprecation
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 2y agoadmiralophtha1.0 release realigns templates with current admiral APIs
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between admiralophtha and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. admiralophtha and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is admiralophtha better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. admiralophtha and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to admiralophtha?
Top admiralophtha alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "admiralophtha alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/admiralophtha for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.