tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
daiquiri vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of daiquiri and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
daiquiri vs webmockr: at a glance
What is daiquiri?
A data-quality report generator that finished its API rewrite and has been coasting on small features since.
daiquiri turns a raw clinical or administrative dataset into an HTML report of time-series data-quality plots, driven by a field-type specification the user writes. The public API settled in 2022 after a wholesale rename for rOpenSci acceptance, and releases since then have added specification conveniences rather than new report content. The 1.2.0 release is the first in nearly two years.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
daiquiri vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
daiquiri
0.0ANALYTICS
A data-quality report generator that finished its API rewrite and has been coasting on small features since.
◆ Current state
daiquiri turns a raw clinical or administrative dataset into an HTML report of time-series data-quality plots, driven by a field-type specification the user writes. The public API settled in 2022 after a wholesale rename for rOpenSci acceptance, and releases since then have added specification conveniences rather than new report content. The 1.2.0 release is the first in nearly two years.
◆ Where it's heading
Development has shifted from restructuring the interface to lowering the cost of using it — field_types_advanced() lets users name only the columns they care about and default the rest, which is the kind of change that matters when a dataset has hundreds of fields. Plot rendering is getting incremental attention (heatmap scaling) rather than new visualisation types. Cadence is roughly annual.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to continue trimming specification boilerplate for wide datasets rather than adding report sections; the entries give no indication of a new plot type or output format in progress.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to daiquiri and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either daiquiri or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all daiquiri alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from daiquiri and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agodaiquirifield_types_advanced() lets specs name only some columns
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agodaiquirift_strata() splits reports by a column's values
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agodaiquiriColumn-order and integer-column validation fixes
- 3y agodaiquiriReport intermediates write to tempdir(), not the library
- 3y agodaiquiriFirst CRAN release
- 3y agodaiquiriPublic API renamed wholesale for rOpenSci acceptance ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between daiquiri and webmockr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. daiquiri and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is daiquiri better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. daiquiri and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to daiquiri?
Top daiquiri alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "daiquiri alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/daiquiri for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.