← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

admiralonco vs mapsf

A side-by-side editorial comparison of admiralonco and mapsf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

admiralonco vs mapsf: at a glance

Featureadmiraloncomapsf
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesoncology, adam, pharmaverse, deprecationcartography, thematic-maps, spatial, base-graphics
Last editorial update3h ago57m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is admiralonco?

The oncology ADaM helper is dissolving into admiral core, one deprecation at a time.

admiralonco is the oncology companion to admiral, and it ships response-criteria recipes rather than code: RECIST, iRECIST, IMWG, GCIG and PCWG3 each arrive as a vignette plus an ADaM template. Cadence is one or two releases a year, each adding a criteria vignette. The 1.4.0 release began deprecating most of the package's own exported functions in favour of generic admiral equivalents.

Read the full admiralonco trajectory →

What is mapsf?

Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.

mapsf produces thematic maps on R's base graphics device — choropleths, proportional symbols, typology maps, rasters, and their combinations, with legends, scale bars, north arrows, and insets as composable elements. Version 1.0.0 was the structural release, introducing a theming system that deprecated eight scattered styling arguments and adding mf_png() and mf_svg() export helpers plus alpha transparency across map types. The 1.1.x and 1.2.x line since then has been steady refinement: background and extent control on the drawing functions, decimal and thousands-separator control in legends, and label placement arguments.

Read the full mapsf trajectory →

admiralonco vs mapsf: editorial side-by-side

A
admiralonco
ANALYTICS
0.0

The oncology ADaM helper is dissolving into admiral core, one deprecation at a time.

◆ Current state

admiralonco is the oncology companion to admiral, and it ships response-criteria recipes rather than code: RECIST, iRECIST, IMWG, GCIG and PCWG3 each arrive as a vignette plus an ADaM template. Cadence is one or two releases a year, each adding a criteria vignette. The 1.4.0 release began deprecating most of the package's own exported functions in favour of generic admiral equivalents.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is converging on a documentation-and-templates model: reusable derivation logic moves upstream into admiral, and admiralonco keeps only the oncology-specific know-how. Every release since 1.0.0 has added a criteria vignette rather than new exported functions, and 1.4.1 extends that by making the template set browsable from the Get Started menu. The surface users program against is shrinking while the guidance they read is growing.

◆ Prediction

Expect the deprecation cycle started in 1.4.0 to advance through its warning and error phases across the next one or two releases, with new work arriving as another response-criteria vignette rather than new functions.

M
mapsf
ANALYTICS
0.0

Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.

◆ Current state

mapsf produces thematic maps on R's base graphics device — choropleths, proportional symbols, typology maps, rasters, and their combinations, with legends, scale bars, north arrows, and insets as composable elements. Version 1.0.0 was the structural release, introducing a theming system that deprecated eight scattered styling arguments and adding mf_png() and mf_svg() export helpers plus alpha transparency across map types. The 1.1.x and 1.2.x line since then has been steady refinement: background and extent control on the drawing functions, decimal and thousands-separator control in legends, and label placement arguments.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has been consolidating control into fewer, more consistent places. Legend handling moved out to the maplegend package in 0.8.0 and the per-element mf_legend_* functions were deprecated in favor of arguments on the map calls themselves; theming replaced ad-hoc style arguments in 1.0.0; and recent releases keep propagating the same argument vocabulary — bg, extent, leg_val_rnd, leg_val_dec, leg_val_big — across every function that should accept it. Determinism is a visible concern too, with 1.2.1 fixing a seed so mf_distr() point positions stop moving between runs.

◆ Prediction

The recent releases are almost entirely argument-parity work across existing functions, so expect that to continue until the vocabulary is uniform rather than any new map type appearing.

Alternatives to admiralonco and mapsf

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either admiralonco or mapsf.

See all admiralonco alternatives → · See all mapsf alternatives →

Recent activity from admiralonco and mapsf

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agomapsfLabel placement arguments and deterministic distribution plots
  2. 2mo agoadmiraloncoTemplate explorer vignette added to Get Started
  3. 2mo agomapsfBackground and extent control across the drawing functions
  4. 6mo agoadmiraloncoPSA endpoints land as function deprecation begins
  5. 7mo agomapsfPNG resolution control and legend number formatting
  6. 11mo agoadmiraloncoPCWG3 response criteria vignette added
  7. 1y agomapsf1.0.0 introduces theming and deprecates eight style arguments
  8. 1y agoadmiraloncoGCIG response criteria vignette added
  9. 1y agomapsfPencil-sketch layers, ckmeans breaks, and border extraction
  10. 2y agomapsfGraticule label display fix
  11. 2y agoadmiraloncoIMWG response criteria vignette added
  12. 2y agoadmiraloncoiRECIST response criteria vignette added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between admiralonco and mapsf?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. admiralonco and mapsf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is admiralonco better than mapsf?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. admiralonco and mapsf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to admiralonco?

Top admiralonco alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "admiralonco alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/admiralonco for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to mapsf?

Top mapsf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mapsf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mapsf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.