← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

admiralonco vs graphicalMCP

A side-by-side editorial comparison of admiralonco and graphicalMCP — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:clinical-trials

admiralonco vs graphicalMCP: at a glance

FeatureadmiraloncographicalMCP
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesoncology, adam, pharmaverse, deprecationclinical-trials, multiple-comparisons, biostatistics, r-language
Last editorial update3h ago43m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is admiralonco?

The oncology ADaM helper is dissolving into admiral core, one deprecation at a time.

admiralonco is the oncology companion to admiral, and it ships response-criteria recipes rather than code: RECIST, iRECIST, IMWG, GCIG and PCWG3 each arrive as a vignette plus an ADaM template. Cadence is one or two releases a year, each adding a criteria vignette. The 1.4.0 release began deprecating most of the package's own exported functions in favour of generic admiral equivalents.

Read the full admiralonco trajectory →

What is graphicalMCP?

graphicalMCP is a narrow statistical tool being hardened rather than grown.

graphicalMCP implements graphical multiple comparison procedures — the method used to control family-wise error across several endpoints in a clinical trial. The package moved under the openpharma organisation in 0.2.6, picked up Hochberg tests and internal validation in 0.2.8, and its most recent release fixes a case where graph testing by closure disagreed with the rejection-based path. Releases are roughly annual and short.

Read the full graphicalMCP trajectory →

admiralonco vs graphicalMCP: editorial side-by-side

A
admiralonco
ANALYTICS
0.0

The oncology ADaM helper is dissolving into admiral core, one deprecation at a time.

◆ Current state

admiralonco is the oncology companion to admiral, and it ships response-criteria recipes rather than code: RECIST, iRECIST, IMWG, GCIG and PCWG3 each arrive as a vignette plus an ADaM template. Cadence is one or two releases a year, each adding a criteria vignette. The 1.4.0 release began deprecating most of the package's own exported functions in favour of generic admiral equivalents.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is converging on a documentation-and-templates model: reusable derivation logic moves upstream into admiral, and admiralonco keeps only the oncology-specific know-how. Every release since 1.0.0 has added a criteria vignette rather than new exported functions, and 1.4.1 extends that by making the template set browsable from the Get Started menu. The surface users program against is shrinking while the guidance they read is growing.

◆ Prediction

Expect the deprecation cycle started in 1.4.0 to advance through its warning and error phases across the next one or two releases, with new work arriving as another response-criteria vignette rather than new functions.

G
graphicalMCP
ANALYTICS
0.0

graphicalMCP is a narrow statistical tool being hardened rather than grown.

◆ Current state

graphicalMCP implements graphical multiple comparison procedures — the method used to control family-wise error across several endpoints in a clinical trial. The package moved under the openpharma organisation in 0.2.6, picked up Hochberg tests and internal validation in 0.2.8, and its most recent release fixes a case where graph testing by closure disagreed with the rejection-based path. Releases are roughly annual and short.

◆ Where it's heading

The changelog reads as a package settling into reference-implementation status: procedure coverage widened once, then the work turned to proving the two computational routes through the same graph agree with each other. That agreement is the whole promise of this kind of tool, since the closure-based calculation is the definition and the rejection-based one is the fast path everyone actually runs. The openpharma move points the same direction — shared maintenance rather than a single author's project.

◆ Prediction

The entries show no feature roadmap, only correctness and validation work, so the next release is most likely another consistency or precision fix rather than a new procedure.

Alternatives to admiralonco and graphicalMCP

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either admiralonco or graphicalMCP.

See all admiralonco alternatives → · See all graphicalMCP alternatives →

Recent activity from admiralonco and graphicalMCP

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agoadmiraloncoTemplate explorer vignette added to Get Started
  2. 4mo agographicalMCPClosure-based and rejection-based graph tests now agree
  3. 6mo agoadmiraloncoPSA endpoints land as function deprecation begins
  4. 11mo agoadmiraloncoPCWG3 response criteria vignette added
  5. 1y agographicalMCPHochberg tests and internal validation added
  6. 1y agoadmiraloncoGCIG response criteria vignette added
  7. 1y agographicalMCPRepository moved to the openpharma organisation
  8. 2y agographicalMCPCRAN resubmission housekeeping
  9. 2y agoadmiraloncoIMWG response criteria vignette added
  10. 2y agoadmiraloncoiRECIST response criteria vignette added
  11. 2y agographicalMCPFirst release of the graphical MCP implementation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between admiralonco and graphicalMCP?

Both compete on the same themes — clinical-trials — within Analytics. admiralonco and graphicalMCP are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is admiralonco better than graphicalMCP?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. admiralonco and graphicalMCP are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to admiralonco?

Top admiralonco alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "admiralonco alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/admiralonco for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to graphicalMCP?

Top graphicalMCP alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "graphicalMCP alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/graphicalmcp for the full list with editorial commentary on each.