← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

admiralonco vs fellingdater

A side-by-side editorial comparison of admiralonco and fellingdater — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

admiralonco vs fellingdater: at a glance

Featureadmiraloncofellingdater
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesoncology, adam, pharmaverse, deprecationdendrochronology, crossdating, archaeology, ropensci
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is admiralonco?

The oncology ADaM helper is dissolving into admiral core, one deprecation at a time.

admiralonco is the oncology companion to admiral, and it ships response-criteria recipes rather than code: RECIST, iRECIST, IMWG, GCIG and PCWG3 each arrive as a vignette plus an ADaM template. Cadence is one or two releases a year, each adding a criteria vignette. The 1.4.0 release began deprecating most of the package's own exported functions in favour of generic admiral equivalents.

Read the full admiralonco trajectory →

What is fellingdater?

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

Read the full fellingdater trajectory →

admiralonco vs fellingdater: editorial side-by-side

A
admiralonco
ANALYTICS
0.0

The oncology ADaM helper is dissolving into admiral core, one deprecation at a time.

◆ Current state

admiralonco is the oncology companion to admiral, and it ships response-criteria recipes rather than code: RECIST, iRECIST, IMWG, GCIG and PCWG3 each arrive as a vignette plus an ADaM template. Cadence is one or two releases a year, each adding a criteria vignette. The 1.4.0 release began deprecating most of the package's own exported functions in favour of generic admiral equivalents.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is converging on a documentation-and-templates model: reusable derivation logic moves upstream into admiral, and admiralonco keeps only the oncology-specific know-how. Every release since 1.0.0 has added a criteria vignette rather than new exported functions, and 1.4.1 extends that by making the template set browsable from the Get Started menu. The surface users program against is shrinking while the guidance they read is growing.

◆ Prediction

Expect the deprecation cycle started in 1.4.0 to advance through its warning and error phases across the next one or two releases, with new work arriving as another response-criteria vignette rather than new functions.

F
fellingdater
ANALYTICS
0.0

Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.

◆ Current state

fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.

◆ Prediction

Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.

Alternatives to admiralonco and fellingdater

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either admiralonco or fellingdater.

See all admiralonco alternatives → · See all fellingdater alternatives →

Recent activity from admiralonco and fellingdater

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agoadmiraloncoTemplate explorer vignette added to Get Started
  2. 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
  3. 6mo agoadmiraloncoPSA endpoints land as function deprecation begins
  4. 11mo agoadmiraloncoPCWG3 response criteria vignette added
  5. 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit
  6. 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
  7. 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
  8. 1y agoadmiraloncoGCIG response criteria vignette added
  9. 2y agoadmiraloncoIMWG response criteria vignette added
  10. 2y agoadmiraloncoiRECIST response criteria vignette added
  11. 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
  12. 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between admiralonco and fellingdater?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. admiralonco and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is admiralonco better than fellingdater?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. admiralonco and fellingdater are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to admiralonco?

Top admiralonco alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "admiralonco alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/admiralonco for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?

Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.