nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
adjustedCurves vs DNSControl
A side-by-side editorial comparison of adjustedCurves and DNSControl — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
adjustedCurves vs DNSControl: at a glance
What is adjustedCurves?
A survival curve package spending release after release correcting its own estimates
adjustedCurves computes confounder-adjusted survival and cumulative incidence curves across a range of estimators - IPTW, AIPTW, Aalen-Johansen, direct standardisation - with support for multiple imputation and bootstrapping. The recent releases are dominated by corrections to numbers the package already reported. Version 0.11.4 fixed cumulative incidence estimates under method="aalen_johansen" that were being read one time step early, which the maintainer notes could differ substantially when events are few, and added risk and event counts to the ggsurvplot conversion including correctly pooled values under multiple imputation.
What is DNSControl?
DNSControl v5 is feature-frozen with a ship date, and rc9 is pure provider cleanup
DNSControl has locked v5.0.0 to bugfixes only with a stated ship date of 25 August 2026. rc9 carries no new capability: punycode decoding before IDNA validation in ALIDNS, a SVCB fix in POWERDNS, NAPTR and trailing-dot fixes in DYNU, a dnssort edge case, and internal refactors replacing pkg/diff and standardising on models.Records. The release notes read as a call for provider testing more than an announcement.
adjustedCurves vs DNSControl: editorial side-by-side
adjustedCurves
0.0INFRA · APIS
A survival curve package spending release after release correcting its own estimates
◆ Current state
adjustedCurves computes confounder-adjusted survival and cumulative incidence curves across a range of estimators - IPTW, AIPTW, Aalen-Johansen, direct standardisation - with support for multiple imputation and bootstrapping. The recent releases are dominated by corrections to numbers the package already reported. Version 0.11.4 fixed cumulative incidence estimates under method="aalen_johansen" that were being read one time step early, which the maintainer notes could differ substantially when events are few, and added risk and event counts to the ggsurvplot conversion including correctly pooled values under multiple imputation.
◆ Where it's heading
Multiple imputation is the recurring fault line. The standard error pooling formula was implemented incorrectly until 0.11.2, then fixed again in 0.11.3 for the bootstrapping-plus-imputation combination, and 0.11.4 added the pooled risk table values that had previously been omitted entirely. A separate thread quietly removed capability: tmle and ostmle methods went in 0.10.0, and tmle support was pulled again in 0.11.1 after the concrete package left CRAN. Feature work does happen - risk tables, contrast arguments, the extend_to_last control on IPTW curves - but it is outweighed by correction.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued estimator-level corrections rather than new methods, and a possible return of tmle support if its upstream dependency returns to CRAN, since the removal was described as temporary.
DNSControl
5.0INFRA · APIS
DNSControl v5 is feature-frozen with a ship date, and rc9 is pure provider cleanup
◆ Current state
DNSControl has locked v5.0.0 to bugfixes only with a stated ship date of 25 August 2026. rc9 carries no new capability: punycode decoding before IDNA validation in ALIDNS, a SVCB fix in POWERDNS, NAPTR and trailing-dot fixes in DYNU, a dnssort edge case, and internal refactors replacing pkg/diff and standardising on models.Records. The release notes read as a call for provider testing more than an announcement.
◆ Where it's heading
The v5 arc has run its course in public: rc1 laid out the dnsv2.RDATA refactor, rc3 finished converting every provider to it, rc4 completed the move to the Codeberg-hosted miekg/dns, and rc8 declared feature completeness. What is left is per-provider correctness on record types that only a handful of users exercise, which is why the maintainer is publishing a list of which providers most need testing rather than shipping.
◆ Prediction
Expect one or two more release candidates of provider fixes before the 25 August date, with the risk concentrated in providers nobody volunteers to test - the notes already flag PACKETFRAME as unmaintained and EXOSCALE as not supporting PTR.
Alternatives to adjustedCurves and DNSControl
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either adjustedCurves or DNSControl.
projoint
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
lifecontingencies
An actuarial mainstay spends its releases on CI plumbing, not on new mathematics.
EDAForge
EDAForge is a data-quality auditor renamed mid-flight, still finding its CRAN footing.
See all adjustedCurves alternatives → · See all DNSControl alternatives →
Recent activity from adjustedCurves and DNSControl
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 14h agoDNSControlDNSControl v5 rc9 sets a 25 August ship date, bugfixes only
- 6d agoDNSControlDNSControl v5 rc8 declared feature complete
- 16d agoDNSControlDNSControl v5 rc4 completes the move to Codeberg-hosted miekg/dns
- 17d agoDNSControlDNSControl v5 rc3 finishes converting every provider
- 27d agoDNSControlDNSControl v5 rc2 continues the internal rewrite
- 29d agoDNSControlDNSControl v5 rc1 lays out the dnsv2.RDATA refactor
- 6mo agoadjustedCurvesOff-by-one-step error corrected in cumulative incidence estimates
- 1y agoadjustedCurvesIPTW curves can now extend to the last observed time
- 2y agoadjustedCurvesDropped arguments and a wrong multiple-imputation pooling formula
- 2y agoadjustedCurvesRisk tables, contrast consolidation and faster bootstrapping
- 3y agoadjustedCurvestmle and ostmle methods dropped
- 3y agoadjustedCurvesDependency compatibility and installation documentation
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between adjustedCurves and DNSControl?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. DNSControl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is adjustedCurves better than DNSControl?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. DNSControl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to adjustedCurves?
Top adjustedCurves alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "adjustedCurves alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/adjustedcurves for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to DNSControl?
Top DNSControl alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "DNSControl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dnscontrol for the full list with editorial commentary on each.