← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

adjustedCurves vs eratosthenes

A side-by-side editorial comparison of adjustedCurves and eratosthenes — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

adjustedCurves vs eratosthenes: at a glance

FeatureadjustedCurveseratosthenes
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, causal-inference, r-package, biostatisticsarchaeology, bayesian-inference, mcmc, input-validation
Last editorial update1d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is adjustedCurves?

A survival curve package spending release after release correcting its own estimates

adjustedCurves computes confounder-adjusted survival and cumulative incidence curves across a range of estimators - IPTW, AIPTW, Aalen-Johansen, direct standardisation - with support for multiple imputation and bootstrapping. The recent releases are dominated by corrections to numbers the package already reported. Version 0.11.4 fixed cumulative incidence estimates under method="aalen_johansen" that were being read one time step early, which the maintainer notes could differ substantially when events are few, and added risk and event counts to the ggsurvplot conversion including correctly pooled values under multiple imputation.

Read the full adjustedCurves trajectory →

What is eratosthenes?

eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.

eratosthenes does Bayesian estimation of archaeological chronologies from relative sequences, absolute constraints and artifact assemblages. The 0.0.9 line built out the inference diagnostics — traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE reporting, displacement estimation — and then consolidated artifact probability-density estimation into a single gibbs_ad_type(). The 0.1.0 tag turns outward instead, adding validators for every user-supplied structure and replacing seq_check() with a more informative seq_diag().

Read the full eratosthenes trajectory →

adjustedCurves vs eratosthenes: editorial side-by-side

A
adjustedCurves
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A survival curve package spending release after release correcting its own estimates

◆ Current state

adjustedCurves computes confounder-adjusted survival and cumulative incidence curves across a range of estimators - IPTW, AIPTW, Aalen-Johansen, direct standardisation - with support for multiple imputation and bootstrapping. The recent releases are dominated by corrections to numbers the package already reported. Version 0.11.4 fixed cumulative incidence estimates under method="aalen_johansen" that were being read one time step early, which the maintainer notes could differ substantially when events are few, and added risk and event counts to the ggsurvplot conversion including correctly pooled values under multiple imputation.

◆ Where it's heading

Multiple imputation is the recurring fault line. The standard error pooling formula was implemented incorrectly until 0.11.2, then fixed again in 0.11.3 for the bootstrapping-plus-imputation combination, and 0.11.4 added the pooled risk table values that had previously been omitted entirely. A separate thread quietly removed capability: tmle and ostmle methods went in 0.10.0, and tmle support was pulled again in 0.11.1 after the concrete package left CRAN. Feature work does happen - risk tables, contrast arguments, the extend_to_last control on IPTW curves - but it is outweighed by correction.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued estimator-level corrections rather than new methods, and a possible return of tmle support if its upstream dependency returns to CRAN, since the removal was described as temporary.

E
eratosthenes
INFRA · APIS
2.5

eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.

◆ Current state

eratosthenes does Bayesian estimation of archaeological chronologies from relative sequences, absolute constraints and artifact assemblages. The 0.0.9 line built out the inference diagnostics — traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE reporting, displacement estimation — and then consolidated artifact probability-density estimation into a single gibbs_ad_type(). The 0.1.0 tag turns outward instead, adding validators for every user-supplied structure and replacing seq_check() with a more informative seq_diag().

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from research code to something a non-author can run. Consolidating estimation behind one function, then wrapping every input class in a validator, are the two steps that make failures legible instead of cryptic, and the diagnostics added earlier serve the same end for the sampler itself. Nothing in the window changes the underlying model; the work is all about making it usable and its output checkable.

◆ Prediction

With inputs validated and diagnostics in place, the next release is more likely to extend the constraint or assemblage modelling than to keep reworking the interface, though the feed's three sparse tags give little to read a cadence from.

Alternatives to adjustedCurves and eratosthenes

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either adjustedCurves or eratosthenes.

See all adjustedCurves alternatives → · See all eratosthenes alternatives →

Recent activity from adjustedCurves and eratosthenes

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10d agoeratosthenesInput validators added; seq_check() replaced by seq_diag()
  2. 6mo agoadjustedCurvesOff-by-one-step error corrected in cumulative incidence estimates
  3. 1y agoadjustedCurvesIPTW curves can now extend to the last observed time
  4. 1y agoeratosthenesArtifact p.d.f. estimation consolidated into gibbs_ad_type()
  5. 1y agoeratosthenesMCMC diagnostics arrive: traceplots, histograms, batch-means MCSE
  6. 2y agoadjustedCurvesDropped arguments and a wrong multiple-imputation pooling formula
  7. 2y agoadjustedCurvesRisk tables, contrast consolidation and faster bootstrapping
  8. 3y agoadjustedCurvestmle and ostmle methods dropped
  9. 3y agoadjustedCurvesDependency compatibility and installation documentation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between adjustedCurves and eratosthenes?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. eratosthenes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is adjustedCurves better than eratosthenes?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. eratosthenes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to adjustedCurves?

Top adjustedCurves alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "adjustedCurves alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/adjustedcurves for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to eratosthenes?

Top eratosthenes alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "eratosthenes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/eratosthenes for the full list with editorial commentary on each.