phyloatlas
An atlas of the tree of life that keeps publishing what it got wrong, and stopped shipping the trees it does not own.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
AdGuard Home vs projoint
A side-by-side editorial comparison of AdGuard Home and projoint — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
AdGuard Home vs projoint: at a glance
What is AdGuard Home?
AdGuard Home patches a DNS-over-QUIC resource exhaustion advisory and moves edge to the new UI
v0.107.79 is presented as a stability release but carries the security work: a Go update for the vulnerabilities fixed in 1.26.6 and hardening against resource exhaustion over DNS-over-QUIC, published as GHSA-w6v6-f44j-3rj2. Alongside it, bootstrap server config accepts comments, install APIs gain a language property, static lease hostnames can be removed over HTTP, strict_sni_check is deprecated, and DNS64 stops treating unresolved CNAME/DNAME answers as the end of the chain.
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
AdGuard Home vs projoint: editorial side-by-side
AdGuard Home
5.0INFRA · APIS
AdGuard Home patches a DNS-over-QUIC resource exhaustion advisory and moves edge to the new UI
◆ Current state
v0.107.79 is presented as a stability release but carries the security work: a Go update for the vulnerabilities fixed in 1.26.6 and hardening against resource exhaustion over DNS-over-QUIC, published as GHSA-w6v6-f44j-3rj2. Alongside it, bootstrap server config accepts comments, install APIs gain a language property, static lease hostnames can be removed over HTTP, strict_sni_check is deprecated, and DNS64 stops treating unresolved CNAME/DNAME answers as the end of the chain.
◆ Where it's heading
Two channels run in parallel — the 0.107 stable line and the 0.108 beta — and the edge channel has now switched to the new UI and versioning scheme, which is the first concrete sign that the 0.108 work is being staged for release. Stable releases keep absorbing protocol correctness fixes and DNS-over-QUIC hardening.
◆ Prediction
With edge already on the new UI and versioning scheme, the 0.108 line is the likely destination for that switch, and strict_sni_check being deprecated now points to its removal there.
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Alternatives to AdGuard Home and projoint
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either AdGuard Home or projoint.
OpenLand
Land-change analysis in R that has spent six years defending one download link.
FoRecoML
The machine-learning arm of a forecast reconciliation toolkit, four months old and already sharing its sibling's plumbing.
FoReco
Forecast reconciliation with a real object model, five years after it started returning bare matrices.
wooldridge
A textbook data package whose whole job is to stay installable, and whose releases prove how much work that is.
L1centrality
A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.
See all AdGuard Home alternatives → · See all projoint alternatives →
Recent activity from AdGuard Home and projoint
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 22h agoAdGuard HomeAdGuard Home 0.107.79 hardens DNS-over-QUIC against resource exhaustion
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 20d agoAdGuard HomeBeta b.90 carries the DNS-over-QUIC exhaustion fix
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 1mo agoAdGuard HomeBeta b.89 hardens against JIGGLE attacks (GHSA-p5f5-3p5g-rfjw)
- 1mo agoAdGuard Home0.107.78: over half the changelog is security fixes
- 2mo agoAdGuard HomeBeta b.88 patches path traversal in GLiNET auth (CVE-2026-41448)
- 2mo agoAdGuard Home0.107.77 patches a community-reported vulnerability
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between AdGuard Home and projoint?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. AdGuard Home is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is AdGuard Home better than projoint?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. AdGuard Home is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to AdGuard Home?
Top AdGuard Home alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "AdGuard Home alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/adguard-home for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.