WPML
WPML made machine translation the default, and its point releases keep chasing WordPress and page builders.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
FoReco vs projoint
A side-by-side editorial comparison of FoReco and projoint — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
FoReco vs projoint: at a glance
What is FoReco?
Forecast reconciliation with a real object model, five years after it started returning bare matrices.
FoReco reconciles hierarchical forecasts across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks, and now covers both point and probabilistic reconciliation. The 1.3.0 release gave every reconciliation function a shared foreco S3 class carrying framework, function, forecast type, and reconciliation metadata, which replaced the loose attribute-and-helper pattern the package had used since 1.0.0. The follow-up 1.3.1 turned the same attention on the API's edges: strict argument validation with errors that name the expected and supplied values, and a help index pruned down to user-facing functions only.
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
FoReco vs projoint: editorial side-by-side
FoReco
0.0INFRA · APIS
Forecast reconciliation with a real object model, five years after it started returning bare matrices.
◆ Current state
FoReco reconciles hierarchical forecasts across cross-sectional, temporal, and cross-temporal frameworks, and now covers both point and probabilistic reconciliation. The 1.3.0 release gave every reconciliation function a shared foreco S3 class carrying framework, function, forecast type, and reconciliation metadata, which replaced the loose attribute-and-helper pattern the package had used since 1.0.0. The follow-up 1.3.1 turned the same attention on the API's edges: strict argument validation with errors that name the expected and supplied values, and a help index pruned down to user-facing functions only.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is completing a reversal it started in 1.0.0. That release simplified outputs to plain matrices and pushed metadata into attributes reachable via recoinfo(); 1.3.0 removed recoinfo() outright and put the structure back as a class with components(), summary(), and plot() methods. The direction is toward being infrastructure rather than a function library — the class is exported through new_foreco_class() and a sibling package has already adopted it. Method coverage has meanwhile broadened from optimal combination into non-negative algorithms, bounded reconciliation, and Gaussian and sample-based probabilistic variants.
◆ Prediction
The soft-deprecated res2matrix() is flagged for removal, so a subsequent release should finish that cleanup; with the class now exported, expect more methods to hang off foreco objects rather than more top-level functions.
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Alternatives to FoReco and projoint
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either FoReco or projoint.
forestploter
A forest plot package that keeps handing users control of one more graphical detail.
ggInterval
Interval-valued data plotting, spending 2026 making its function names and examples survive CRAN.
rgm
A microbiome network model that got itself un-archived by deleting the dependency that killed it.
contagionchannels
Three releases in ten days, every one of them a CRAN reviewer's correction rather than a code change.
tidyaudit
Pipeline provenance for tidyverse workflows, recording what changed at each step without keeping the data.
See all FoReco alternatives → · See all projoint alternatives →
Recent activity from FoReco and projoint
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 1mo agoFoRecoStrict argument validation and a pruned help index
- 1mo agoFoRecoEvery reconciliation function now returns a shared foreco object ⚡
- 3mo agoFoRecoBootstrap functions gain xreg; simulate() argument bug fixed
- 5mo agoFoRecoGaussian and sample-based probabilistic reconciliation added
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
- 1y agoFoRecoBounded reconciliation and an oracle shrunk covariance estimator
- 1y agoFoRecoBreaking rename: cs, te and ct prefixes across all functions
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between FoReco and projoint?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is FoReco better than projoint?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to FoReco?
Top FoReco alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "FoReco alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/foreco for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.