← Back to team collaboration tools
Alternatives · team collaboration tools

Interact alternatives

The best Interact alternatives in team collaboration tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.

Updated Sep 11, 2026

Looking for the best alternatives to Interact? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in team collaboration tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, Interact shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 6.3 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.

About Interact

Interact pushes agentic AI: Spring Launch ships Action Agent and Workday workflows

Interact's feed centers on a real product cycle — a Spring Launch introducing Action Agent and agentic AI capabilities (content moderation, AI Search upgrades, Workday workflows) — alongside a brand-evolution milestone and AI-governance thought-leadership. It reads as an intranet vendor making a concrete agentic-AI move, not just positioning.

Velocity 6.3 · Last update 3mo ago

Read the full Interact trajectory →

Top 12 alternatives to Interact

Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.

Browse all team collaboration tools products →

Interact vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance

Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.

ProductVelocitySparks · 30dFocus areasLatest release
Interact (baseline)6.30intranetagentic-aienterprise-aiInteract advances its agentic AI vision with content moderation, cross-system search, and Workday workflows
GitHub10.00copilot-enterpriseai-governancesupply-chain-security
Teable8.81databaseautomationai-agentsScheduled Routines and Composio connections ship together
Softr7.52no-codemcpai-agentsA brand new way to build with Softr
Document3607.51knowledge-basedocumentationcollaborative-editingAugust 2026 - 12.8.4
Tana7.52ambient-aivoice-agentmeeting-captureHey Tana just does it, a Calendar, and a new Home
Hive6.30project-managementai-automationworkflow
Mattermost6.30zero-trustabacsovereign-ai
Double6.31ai-accountingmodel-tieringagentic-workflowsAsk Double adds three-tier AI models: Standard 93% off, Auto routing, Expert on Claude Opus 5
Outline6.31knowledge-managementmcpai-agentsWebMCP support
Skedda6.31space-managementoccupancy-analyticsenterpriseOccupancy Insights
Wiki.js6.31knowledge-managemententerprise-authssoWiki.js 3.0-beta.554: Entra, LDAP, SAML, and social auth with group mapping
Immich6.31self-hostedphoto-managementai-searchv3.2.0 RC1: new search UI, face cluster groups, memories view

The 12 best Interact alternatives, in depth

1. GitHub · velocity 10.0

GitHub wires enterprise governance controls into Copilot's agentic layer.

Its velocity score of 10.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, GitHub focuses on copilot enterprise, ai governance and supply chain security.

GitHub and Interact have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

2. Teable · velocity 8.8

Teable ships Scheduled Routines and Composio connections, gaining both a scheduler and an integration bus in one release.

Over the last 30 days Teable shipped 1 meaningful update vs Interact's 0, most recently “Scheduled Routines and Composio connections ship together”. Its velocity score of 8.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Teable focuses on database, automation and ai agents.

Over the last 30 days Teable has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

3. Softr · velocity 7.5

Softr ships MCP and embedded agents, making no-code apps AI-orchestratable.

Over the last 30 days Softr shipped 2 meaningful updates vs Interact's 0, most recently “A brand new way to build with Softr”. Its velocity score of 7.5/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Softr focuses on no code, mcp and ai agents.

Over the last 30 days Softr has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

4. Document360 · velocity 7.5

Document360 ships collaborative editing and API v3 with OAuth 2.0 in back-to-back releases.

Over the last 30 days Document360 shipped 1 meaningful update vs Interact's 0, most recently “August 2026 - 12.8.4”. Its velocity score of 7.5/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Document360 focuses on knowledge base, documentation and collaborative editing.

Over the last 30 days Document360 has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

5. Tana · velocity 7.5

Tana races toward ambient AI assistant — voice commands now execute silently without interrupting you.

Over the last 30 days Tana shipped 2 meaningful updates vs Interact's 0, most recently “Hey Tana just does it, a Calendar, and a new Home”. Its velocity score of 7.5/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Tana focuses on ambient ai, voice agent and meeting capture.

Over the last 30 days Tana has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

6. Hive · velocity 6.3

Hive is building shared AI automation infrastructure into the core of its PM platform.

Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Hive focuses on project management, ai automation and workflow.

Hive and Interact have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

7. Mattermost · velocity 6.3

Mattermost is running a coordinated Zero Trust and sovereign AI narrative ahead of a major October release.

Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Mattermost focuses on zero trust, abac and sovereign ai.

Mattermost and Interact have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

8. Double · velocity 6.3

Double restructures AI pricing with a 93%-cheaper Standard tier, making Ask Double viable at full-book scale.

Over the last 30 days Double shipped 1 meaningful update vs Interact's 0, most recently “Ask Double adds three-tier AI models: Standard 93% off, Auto routing, Expert on Claude Opus 5”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Double focuses on ai accounting, model tiering and agentic workflows.

Over the last 30 days Double has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

9. Outline · velocity 6.3

Outline goes browser-native for AI agents with WebMCP, accelerating its bet on agentic knowledge management.

Over the last 30 days Outline shipped 1 meaningful update vs Interact's 0, most recently “WebMCP support”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Outline focuses on knowledge management, mcp and ai agents.

Over the last 30 days Outline has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

10. Skedda · velocity 6.3

Skedda builds a data layer under its booking product with occupancy analytics and multi-venue insights.

Over the last 30 days Skedda shipped 1 meaningful update vs Interact's 0, most recently “Occupancy Insights”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Skedda focuses on space management, occupancy analytics and enterprise.

Over the last 30 days Skedda has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

11. Wiki.js · velocity 6.3

Wiki.js 3.0 beta accelerates with enterprise auth (Entra, LDAP, SAML) and audit logging.

Over the last 30 days Wiki.js shipped 1 meaningful update vs Interact's 0, most recently “Wiki.js 3.0-beta.554: Entra, LDAP, SAML, and social auth with group mapping”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Wiki.js focuses on knowledge management, enterprise auth and sso.

Over the last 30 days Wiki.js has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

12. Immich · velocity 6.3

Immich's v3.2 RC ships a new search UI and face clustering, advancing self-hosted photo discovery.

Over the last 30 days Immich shipped 1 meaningful update vs Interact's 0, most recently “v3.2.0 RC1: new search UI, face cluster groups, memories view”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where Interact leans on intranet, agentic ai and enterprise ai, Immich focuses on self hosted, photo management and ai search.

Over the last 30 days Immich has been shipping faster than Interact — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

Frequently asked questions

What are the best alternatives to Interact?

The top Interact alternatives we currently track in team collaboration tools are GitHub, Teable, Softr, Document360, Tana, ranked by recent ship velocity.

How is this list of Interact alternatives ranked?

Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.

Can I compare Interact directly with one of these alternatives?

Yes — every card has a "Compare with Interact" link to a side-by-side /compare page.