← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

ZoneMinder vs Dokploy

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ZoneMinder and Dokploy — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ZoneMinder vs Dokploy: at a glance

FeatureZoneMinderDokploy
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesvideo surveillance, rbac, onvif, webrtcself-hosted-paas, secrets-encryption, security-hardening, plan-limits
Last editorial update1h ago54m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ZoneMinder?

ZoneMinder 1.38 finally split capturing from analysing — and added roles to a system that had none.

ZoneMinder runs two lines in parallel. The 1.38 series, opened in February, brought role-based access control, WebRTC, Go2RTC and RTSP2Web streaming with hardware acceleration, a redesigned monitor model splitting Capturing, Analysing and Recording into separate settings, ONVIF events, MQTT and event tagging. The legacy 1.36 branch is still receiving fixes, including a stored SQL injection through event name and cause fields. The 1.38.1 release replaced four vendor-specific ONVIF implementations with a single control module.

Read the full ZoneMinder trajectory →

What is Dokploy?

A self-hosted PaaS spending its releases on secrets, injection fixes and plan limits.

Dokploy cuts patch releases every one to two weeks, and the recent stream is dominated by hardening rather than features. v0.29.12 added AES-256-GCM encryption for environment variables at rest and made backups carry the full keyring; v0.29.13 closed an OS command injection in git clone across all providers. The newest tag says outright that it is bug fixes only. Alongside that, plan limits landed in v0.29.10.

Read the full Dokploy trajectory →

ZoneMinder vs Dokploy: editorial side-by-side

Z
ZoneMinder
INFRA · APIS
0.0

ZoneMinder 1.38 finally split capturing from analysing — and added roles to a system that had none.

◆ Current state

ZoneMinder runs two lines in parallel. The 1.38 series, opened in February, brought role-based access control, WebRTC, Go2RTC and RTSP2Web streaming with hardware acceleration, a redesigned monitor model splitting Capturing, Analysing and Recording into separate settings, ONVIF events, MQTT and event tagging. The legacy 1.36 branch is still receiving fixes, including a stored SQL injection through event name and cause fields. The 1.38.1 release replaced four vendor-specific ONVIF implementations with a single control module.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is consolidating a decade of accumulated special cases: four ONVIF implementations become one, monitor function modes become independent toggles, and streaming moves onto standard components rather than bespoke paths. Meanwhile 1.36 keeps being patched for security and build compatibility, which means a substantial install base has not moved. Release engineering itself is visibly strained — 1.38.2 was abandoned mid-flight over a Debian packaging conflict.

◆ Prediction

Expect 1.38 patch releases to keep folding in security and memory-safety fixes while the 1.36 branch receives only vulnerability backports until it is retired. Whether the new streaming stack becomes the default rather than an option is not settled by these entries.

D
Dokploy
INFRA · APIS
6.3

A self-hosted PaaS spending its releases on secrets, injection fixes and plan limits.

◆ Current state

Dokploy cuts patch releases every one to two weeks, and the recent stream is dominated by hardening rather than features. v0.29.12 added AES-256-GCM encryption for environment variables at rest and made backups carry the full keyring; v0.29.13 closed an OS command injection in git clone across all providers. The newest tag says outright that it is bug fixes only. Alongside that, plan limits landed in v0.29.10.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is a self-hosted platform trying to earn production trust: encrypted secrets, injection fixes, a pinned install script tied to each release, and Postgres query rewrites to stop hitting the 100-argument limit on rollbacks, schedules and backups. Plan limits point the other way — toward a commercial tier layered on the open-source core. Both arcs suggest the project is past feature-chasing and into making the platform defensible.

◆ Prediction

Expect the hardening thread to continue into the rest of the 0.29 line, with the plan-limits work being the seed of a paid tier that gets more definition before a 0.30 release.

Alternatives to ZoneMinder and Dokploy

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ZoneMinder or Dokploy.

See all ZoneMinder alternatives → · See all Dokploy alternatives →

Recent activity from ZoneMinder and Dokploy

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 9h agoDokployv0.29.14: fixes only, including Postgres argument-limit rewrites
  2. 15d agoDokployv0.29.13 closes an OS command injection in git clone
  3. 24d agoDokployv0.29.12 encrypts environment variables at rest with AES-256-GCM
  4. 28d agoDokployv0.29.11 pins the install script to each release
  5. 1mo agoDokployv0.29.10 introduces plan limits
  6. 1mo agoZoneMinder1.38.3 supersedes an abandoned 1.38.2 build
  7. 5mo agoZoneMinderStored SQL injection patched on the 1.36 branch
  8. 5mo agoZoneMinderOne ONVIF module replaces four vendor implementations
  9. 6mo agoZoneMinder1.38 adds RBAC, WebRTC, and splits monitor functions
  10. 7mo agoZoneMinderFFmpeg 8.0 build fixes on the legacy branch
  11. 10mo agoZoneMinderPath handling and Debian trixie build support

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ZoneMinder and Dokploy?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Dokploy is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ZoneMinder better than Dokploy?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Dokploy is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ZoneMinder?

Top ZoneMinder alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ZoneMinder alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/zoneminder for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Dokploy?

Top Dokploy alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Dokploy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dokploy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.