tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
webmockr vs xplainfi
A side-by-side editorial comparison of webmockr and xplainfi — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
webmockr vs xplainfi: at a glance
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
What is xplainfi?
xplainfi treats feature importance as an estimate with error bars, not a number.
xplainfi implements feature importance methods for mlr3 — perturbation-based PFI, CFI and RFI, refit-based LOCO and WVIM, and SAGE. Its defining choice is that importance scores come with inference attached: several confidence-interval methods, including the Nadeau-Bengio correction and a distribution-free option added in 1.1.0. It declared itself released at 1.0.0 in January 2026.
webmockr vs xplainfi: editorial side-by-side
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
xplainfi
2.5ANALYTICS
xplainfi treats feature importance as an estimate with error bars, not a number.
◆ Current state
xplainfi implements feature importance methods for mlr3 — perturbation-based PFI, CFI and RFI, refit-based LOCO and WVIM, and SAGE. Its defining choice is that importance scores come with inference attached: several confidence-interval methods, including the Nadeau-Bengio correction and a distribution-free option added in 1.1.0. It declared itself released at 1.0.0 in January 2026.
◆ Where it's heading
Two lines of work run in parallel. The statistical side keeps adding inference options — variance corrections, conditional predictive impact, and the Lei et al. observation-wise loss-difference test — while the computational side attacks the cost of refit-based methods, most recently with a batch_size argument that parallelises refits and a default of one refit per resampling iteration. Support for pre-trained learners in 1.1.0 removes the refit requirement entirely in some workflows.
◆ Prediction
The stated reasoning that budget is better spent on resampling iterations than repeated refits suggests n_repeats may be removed from WVIM and LOCO outright, as the release notes hint.
Alternatives to webmockr and xplainfi
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either webmockr or xplainfi.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all webmockr alternatives → · See all xplainfi alternatives →
Recent activity from webmockr and xplainfi
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 21d agoxplainfiRefits parallelise; repeated refits deprioritised in favour of resampling
- 5mo agoxplainfiPre-trained learners supported; distribution-free inference added
- 6mo agoxplainfiVersion bumped to mark the package as released
- 9mo agoxplainfiConfidence intervals arrive for feature importance scores
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between webmockr and xplainfi?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. xplainfi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is webmockr better than xplainfi?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. xplainfi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to xplainfi?
Top xplainfi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "xplainfi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/xplainfi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.