tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
USAboundaries vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of USAboundaries and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
USAboundaries vs webmockr: at a glance
What is USAboundaries?
Seven years dormant, then two releases dragging every census boundary from 2020 to 2024
USAboundaries supplies contemporary and historical US boundary data — states, counties, congressional districts, cities, ZIP code tabulation areas — as sf objects, with the bulk data held in a companion USAboundariesData package. After a gap running from 2018 to late 2025, two releases a month apart refreshed the contemporary census vintage from 2020 to 2024: 0.5.0 covered everything except states, and 0.5.1 finished the job.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
USAboundaries vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
USAboundaries
0.0ANALYTICS
Seven years dormant, then two releases dragging every census boundary from 2020 to 2024
◆ Current state
USAboundaries supplies contemporary and historical US boundary data — states, counties, congressional districts, cities, ZIP code tabulation areas — as sf objects, with the bulk data held in a companion USAboundariesData package. After a gap running from 2018 to late 2025, two releases a month apart refreshed the contemporary census vintage from 2020 to 2024: 0.5.0 covered everything except states, and 0.5.1 finished the job.
◆ Where it's heading
For a data package the release cycle is the data vintage, and the 0.3.0 split into a separate data package was designed precisely so those refreshes would not require a code release. That the 2024 update still arrived as two package versions seven years later says the mechanism is being used sparingly. Nothing in the feed shows work on the API itself since us_cities() gained an sf return type and a states argument in 2018.
◆ Prediction
The next release is most likely another vintage refresh when the census data moves again, rather than new geographies or functions. The split of 0.5.0 and 0.5.1 suggests state boundaries are handled on a separate path from the rest and may lag again.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to USAboundaries and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either USAboundaries or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all USAboundaries alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from USAboundaries and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 9mo agoUSAboundariesState boundaries updated to the 2024 census vintage
- 10mo agoUSAboundariesCensus data refreshed to 2024, states excepted
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
- 8y agoUSAboundariesus_cities() returns sf and gains a states argument
- 9y agoUSAboundariesData split into a companion package; all boundaries become sf ⚡
- 9y agoUSAboundariesContemporary state, county and district boundaries added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between USAboundaries and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. USAboundaries and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is USAboundaries better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. USAboundaries and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to USAboundaries?
Top USAboundaries alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "USAboundaries alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/usaboundaries for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.