DoseFinding
New stewardship at openpharma, then two releases adding the methods MCP-Mod was missing
Comparison · Analytics
textreuse vs typst-gather
A side-by-side editorial comparison of textreuse and typst-gather — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
textreuse vs typst-gather: at a glance
What is textreuse?
A dormant text-matching package revived, shipped as 1.0.0, and kept current with the tidyverse.
textreuse detects reused and quoted passages across document collections using minhash and locality-sensitive hashing, with local alignment for inspecting the matches it finds. After years of inactivity, the package reached a 1.0.0 CRAN release in May 2026 that folded accumulated feature work into one version — encoding control on corpus construction, deterministic skipped-document bookkeeping, and an align_local() that returns an empty alignment instead of erroring on non-matching texts. The 1.0.2 release since then is pure compatibility maintenance.
What is typst-gather?
Extracted from Quarto's CLI, typst-gather learned to explain a dependency tree before fetching it.
typst-gather collects Typst packages into a local cache so documents build offline and hermetically. It was extracted from quarto-cli and reached CRAN-equivalent shape in three releases over a single day, then added an `analyze` subcommand that walks `@Preview` and `@Local` imports — following transitive dependencies of local packages — and prints structured JSON without downloading or copying anything.
textreuse vs typst-gather: editorial side-by-side
textreuse
2.5ANALYTICS
A dormant text-matching package revived, shipped as 1.0.0, and kept current with the tidyverse.
◆ Current state
textreuse detects reused and quoted passages across document collections using minhash and locality-sensitive hashing, with local alignment for inspecting the matches it finds. After years of inactivity, the package reached a 1.0.0 CRAN release in May 2026 that folded accumulated feature work into one version — encoding control on corpus construction, deterministic skipped-document bookkeeping, and an align_local() that returns an empty alignment instead of erroring on non-matching texts. The 1.0.2 release since then is pure compatibility maintenance.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc here is restoration rather than expansion. The work has gone into making the package survivable — silencing deprecated dplyr and tidyr selection and many-to-many join warnings, moving from dead Travis and AppVeyor configs to GitHub Actions, and validating across five R platform and version combinations. Release notes now lead with verification evidence rather than features, which is the signature of a maintainer stabilizing an inherited codebase.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued compatibility releases tracking tidyverse deprecations; nothing in these entries indicates new hashing or alignment capability is planned.
typst-gather
0.0ANALYTICS
Extracted from Quarto's CLI, typst-gather learned to explain a dependency tree before fetching it.
◆ Current state
typst-gather collects Typst packages into a local cache so documents build offline and hermetically. It was extracted from quarto-cli and reached CRAN-equivalent shape in three releases over a single day, then added an `analyze` subcommand that walks `@Preview` and `@Local` imports — following transitive dependencies of local packages — and prints structured JSON without downloading or copying anything.
◆ Where it's heading
The 0.2.0 restructuring is the tell: subcommands with backwards compatibility, config readable from stdin, and every diagnostic message moved to stderr so stdout carries nothing but JSON. Those are the conventions of a tool meant to be called by another program, not typed by a person. Given its origin inside Quarto's toolchain, the plausible consumer is a build system that needs to know a document's package requirements before deciding what to fetch.
◆ Prediction
The analyze path currently reports imports; the natural extension visible from here is acting on that report — lockfile output or verification that a cache satisfies a document's dependency set — though the entries do not commit to either.
Alternatives to textreuse and typst-gather
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either textreuse or typst-gather.
webmockr
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
crul
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
dendroNetwork
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
chattr
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
cloudml
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
See all textreuse alternatives → · See all typst-gather alternatives →
Recent activity from textreuse and typst-gather
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 20d agotextreuseCompatibility pass for current dplyr and tidyr
- 3mo agotextreuseCRAN resubmission fixing a moved README URL
- 3mo agotextreuse1.0.0 consolidates years of accumulated feature work
- 5mo agotypst-gatheranalyze subcommand reports the import graph as JSON ⚡
- 5mo agotypst-gatherWindows path escaping fix and README expansion
- 5mo agotypst-gatherSplit out of quarto-cli as a standalone package gatherer
- 10y agotextreuseMinhashes split out from hashes in document objects
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between textreuse and typst-gather?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. textreuse is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is textreuse better than typst-gather?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. textreuse is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to textreuse?
Top textreuse alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "textreuse alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/textreuse for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to typst-gather?
Top typst-gather alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "typst-gather alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/typst-gather for the full list with editorial commentary on each.