← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

Terragrunt vs Dokploy

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Terragrunt and Dokploy — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Terragrunt vs Dokploy: at a glance

FeatureTerragruntDokploy
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesterraform, infrastructure-as-code, experiments, release-candidateself-hosted-paas, secrets-encryption, security-hardening, plan-limits
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Terragrunt?

Terragrunt graduated six experiments at once and has spent three candidates stabilising them

Terragrunt is running the v1.1.0 release-candidate cycle, now at rc3. The first candidate completed six experiments simultaneously — stack-dependencies, a content-addressable store, a catalog redesign, mark-many-as-read, opt-out-auth and DAG queue display. The two candidates since have added only bug fixes for those features plus improvements to how releases are published and verified.

Read the full Terragrunt trajectory →

What is Dokploy?

A self-hosted PaaS spending its releases on secrets, injection fixes and plan limits.

Dokploy cuts patch releases every one to two weeks, and the recent stream is dominated by hardening rather than features. v0.29.12 added AES-256-GCM encryption for environment variables at rest and made backups carry the full keyring; v0.29.13 closed an OS command injection in git clone across all providers. The newest tag says outright that it is bug fixes only. Alongside that, plan limits landed in v0.29.10.

Read the full Dokploy trajectory →

Terragrunt vs Dokploy: editorial side-by-side

T
Terragrunt
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Terragrunt graduated six experiments at once and has spent three candidates stabilising them

◆ Current state

Terragrunt is running the v1.1.0 release-candidate cycle, now at rc3. The first candidate completed six experiments simultaneously — stack-dependencies, a content-addressable store, a catalog redesign, mark-many-as-read, opt-out-auth and DAG queue display. The two candidates since have added only bug fixes for those features plus improvements to how releases are published and verified.

◆ Where it's heading

The experiment-graduation model is doing what it is supposed to: features developed behind flags land together in one minor, and the candidate cycle is purely stabilisation. The release-publishing and verification work appearing in rc2 suggests supply-chain provenance is being treated as release-blocking rather than as a follow-up.

◆ Prediction

With three candidates carrying identical feature lists, v1.1.0 final is the likely next release, followed by a fresh batch of experiments opening for v1.2.

D
Dokploy
INFRA · APIS
6.3

A self-hosted PaaS spending its releases on secrets, injection fixes and plan limits.

◆ Current state

Dokploy cuts patch releases every one to two weeks, and the recent stream is dominated by hardening rather than features. v0.29.12 added AES-256-GCM encryption for environment variables at rest and made backups carry the full keyring; v0.29.13 closed an OS command injection in git clone across all providers. The newest tag says outright that it is bug fixes only. Alongside that, plan limits landed in v0.29.10.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is a self-hosted platform trying to earn production trust: encrypted secrets, injection fixes, a pinned install script tied to each release, and Postgres query rewrites to stop hitting the 100-argument limit on rollbacks, schedules and backups. Plan limits point the other way — toward a commercial tier layered on the open-source core. Both arcs suggest the project is past feature-chasing and into making the platform defensible.

◆ Prediction

Expect the hardening thread to continue into the rest of the 0.29 line, with the plan-limits work being the seed of a paid tier that gets more definition before a 0.30 release.

Alternatives to Terragrunt and Dokploy

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Terragrunt or Dokploy.

See all Terragrunt alternatives → · See all Dokploy alternatives →

Recent activity from Terragrunt and Dokploy

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10h agoDokployv0.29.14: fixes only, including Postgres argument-limit rewrites
  2. 16d agoDokployv0.29.13 closes an OS command injection in git clone
  3. 24d agoDokployv0.29.12 encrypts environment variables at rest with AES-256-GCM
  4. 28d agoDokployv0.29.11 pins the install script to each release
  5. 1mo agoDokployv0.29.10 introduces plan limits
  6. 1mo agoTerragruntv1.1.0-rc3
  7. 1mo agoTerragruntv1.1.0-rc2
  8. 1mo agoTerragruntv1.1.0-rc1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Terragrunt and Dokploy?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Dokploy is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Terragrunt better than Dokploy?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Dokploy is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Terragrunt?

Top Terragrunt alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Terragrunt alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/terragrunt for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Dokploy?

Top Dokploy alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Dokploy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dokploy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.