rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
surveytidy vs watcher
A side-by-side editorial comparison of surveytidy and watcher — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
surveytidy vs watcher: at a glance
What is surveytidy?
surveytidy taught every dplyr verb to operate on a whole collection of surveys at once.
surveytidy is the tidyverse-facing half of a two-package survey stack, wrapping survey design objects from surveycore so filter, mutate, select and the rest work on them while carrying variable labels, value labels and a transformation log alongside the data. The May release extended that verb surface to survey_collection, the abstraction surveycore uses to hold several surveys as one object, so a pipeline written once dispatches across every member.
What is watcher?
watcher is a thin filesystem-events binding whose releases are mostly build work.
The package wraps libfswatch in an R6 Watcher class for monitoring files and directories. Seven releases over sixteen months have added a vector path argument and two accessor methods, and spent the rest of their effort on build portability — non-standard system library locations, Windows bi-arch source builds on old rtools, and most recently removing the cmake requirement so the bundled source compiles with the R toolchain alone.
surveytidy vs watcher: editorial side-by-side
surveytidy
0.0INFRA · APIS
surveytidy taught every dplyr verb to operate on a whole collection of surveys at once.
◆ Current state
surveytidy is the tidyverse-facing half of a two-package survey stack, wrapping survey design objects from surveycore so filter, mutate, select and the rest work on them while carrying variable labels, value labels and a transformation log alongside the data. The May release extended that verb surface to survey_collection, the abstraction surveycore uses to hold several surveys as one object, so a pipeline written once dispatches across every member.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is being built in two layers that arrive in order: vector-level transformations first, structural dispatch second. The make_* family in 0.4.0 handles the recoding that survey work actually consists of — labelled to factor, multi-level to dichotomous, scale reversal, valence flipping — with value labels propagating automatically. Collection support then applies data-masking, tidyselect, grouping, slicing and collapsing verbs per survey, with joins explicitly refused and a typed message reporting which surveys were skipped. Metadata fidelity is the recurring bug source: labels surviving across(), stale labels left behind by recoding, the transformation log keeping up with what the verbs did.
◆ Prediction
Joins are the one verb family that errors on collections, with users directed to join before constructing the collection, so that restriction is the clearest outstanding gap. The re-export of surveycore's collection constructors suggests the package is positioning itself as the single import users need, which points toward more re-exports as surveycore's stable API settles.
watcher
0.0INFRA · APIS
watcher is a thin filesystem-events binding whose releases are mostly build work.
◆ Current state
The package wraps libfswatch in an R6 Watcher class for monitoring files and directories. Seven releases over sixteen months have added a vector path argument and two accessor methods, and spent the rest of their effort on build portability — non-standard system library locations, Windows bi-arch source builds on old rtools, and most recently removing the cmake requirement so the bundled source compiles with the R toolchain alone.
◆ Where it's heading
The API is deliberately small and appears finished; the work that remains is making the C dependency install cleanly everywhere. Dropping cmake follows the same move nanonext made, which is not a coincidence — both come from the same author and both are aiming at environments where installing a build system is not an option.
◆ Prediction
With cmake gone and the bundled library current, further releases are most likely to track libfswatch upstream rather than extend the R interface.
Alternatives to surveytidy and watcher
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either surveytidy or watcher.
massProps
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
See all surveytidy alternatives → · See all watcher alternatives →
Recent activity from surveytidy and watcher
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agowatchercmake dropped from the bundled library build
- 2mo agosurveytidymutate() syncs metadata for across() recodes
- 3mo agowatcherBundled libfswatch updated to 1.20.1
- 3mo agosurveytidydplyr and tidyr verbs dispatch across survey collections
- 5mo agosurveytidyFive label-aware recoding functions for use inside mutate()
- 8mo agowatcherWindows CPU usage fix for sub-second latency
- 1y agowatcherSystem libfswatch found in non-standard locations
- 1y agowatcherMultiple paths per watcher, and older Windows builds fixed
- 1y agowatcherAccessor methods replace public Watcher fields
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between surveytidy and watcher?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. surveytidy and watcher are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is surveytidy better than watcher?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. surveytidy and watcher are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to surveytidy?
Top surveytidy alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveytidy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveytidy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to watcher?
Top watcher alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "watcher alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/watcher for the full list with editorial commentary on each.