rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
surveycore vs watcher
A side-by-side editorial comparison of surveycore and watcher — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
surveycore vs watcher: at a glance
What is surveycore?
surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.
surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.
What is watcher?
watcher is a thin filesystem-events binding whose releases are mostly build work.
The package wraps libfswatch in an R6 Watcher class for monitoring files and directories. Seven releases over sixteen months have added a vector path argument and two accessor methods, and spent the rest of their effort on build portability — non-standard system library locations, Windows bi-arch source builds on old rtools, and most recently removing the cmake requirement so the bundled source compiles with the R toolchain alone.
surveycore vs watcher: editorial side-by-side
surveycore
0.0INFRA · APIS
surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.
◆ Current state
surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.
◆ Where it's heading
The last months before 1.0.0 were spent making the awkward designs behave like the ordinary ones. Non-probability designs gained jackknife replicate schemes and got their bootstrap repweights routed through the replicate-weight variance estimator in survey_glm(), matching every other estimation function. The survey_collection abstraction — several surveys treated as one pseudo-data-frame — was tightened rather than extended: divergent grouping across members now errors instead of stitching a patchwork with bind_rows(), and the missing-variable argument was renamed and given a stored default on the collection itself. A documentation audit before 1.0.0 turned up six dispatch and print bugs and corrections across forty-plus files, which is the kind of thing that surfaces when an API is being frozen rather than extended.
◆ Prediction
A declared-stable API means the next releases should be additive or corrective rather than breaking, and the pre-1.0.0 pattern of breaking renames should stop. The tight version pinning between the two packages means surveytidy releases will keep following surveycore's.
watcher
0.0INFRA · APIS
watcher is a thin filesystem-events binding whose releases are mostly build work.
◆ Current state
The package wraps libfswatch in an R6 Watcher class for monitoring files and directories. Seven releases over sixteen months have added a vector path argument and two accessor methods, and spent the rest of their effort on build portability — non-standard system library locations, Windows bi-arch source builds on old rtools, and most recently removing the cmake requirement so the bundled source compiles with the R toolchain alone.
◆ Where it's heading
The API is deliberately small and appears finished; the work that remains is making the C dependency install cleanly everywhere. Dropping cmake follows the same move nanonext made, which is not a coincidence — both come from the same author and both are aiming at environments where installing a build system is not an option.
◆ Prediction
With cmake gone and the bundled library current, further releases are most likely to track libfswatch upstream rather than extend the R interface.
Alternatives to surveycore and watcher
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either surveycore or watcher.
massProps
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
See all surveycore alternatives → · See all watcher alternatives →
Recent activity from surveycore and watcher
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agowatchercmake dropped from the bundled library build
- 2mo agosurveycoreFirst stable release: all four survey design types complete ⚡
- 3mo agowatcherBundled libfswatch updated to 1.20.1
- 3mo agosurveycoreget_effective_n() computes effective sample size
- 3mo agosurveycoreCollections error on divergent grouping; .on_missing renamed
- 4mo agosurveycoreCRAN patch removing surveytidy from the vignette
- 8mo agowatcherWindows CPU usage fix for sub-second latency
- 1y agowatcherSystem libfswatch found in non-standard locations
- 1y agowatcherMultiple paths per watcher, and older Windows builds fixed
- 1y agowatcherAccessor methods replace public Watcher fields
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between surveycore and watcher?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. surveycore and watcher are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is surveycore better than watcher?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. surveycore and watcher are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to surveycore?
Top surveycore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveycore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveycore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to watcher?
Top watcher alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "watcher alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/watcher for the full list with editorial commentary on each.