midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
Comparison · Infra & APIs
surveycore vs traumar
A side-by-side editorial comparison of surveycore and traumar — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
surveycore vs traumar: at a glance
| Feature | surveycore | traumar |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | survey-statistics, variance-estimation, replicate-weights, api-stability | trauma-registry, healthcare-quality, statistical-correctness, data-validation |
| Last editorial update | 1h ago | 4h ago |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
What is surveycore?
surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.
surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.
What is traumar?
Trauma registry statistics in R, tightening the numbers it reports against the literature.
traumar computes trauma-centre performance measures from registry data, including relative mortality metrics, SEQIC quality indicators and predicted survival probability. The recent releases are dominated by correctness rather than coverage: 1.2.5 changed how the denominator for SEQIC indicator 7 is derived so it reflects the definitive care population rather than a raw row count, and 1.2.3 realigned probability_of_survival() with published coefficients. Version 1.2.6 completes a deprecation, turning the old n_decimal argument into an error.
surveycore vs traumar: editorial side-by-side
surveycore
0.0INFRA · APIS
surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.
◆ Current state
surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.
◆ Where it's heading
The last months before 1.0.0 were spent making the awkward designs behave like the ordinary ones. Non-probability designs gained jackknife replicate schemes and got their bootstrap repweights routed through the replicate-weight variance estimator in survey_glm(), matching every other estimation function. The survey_collection abstraction — several surveys treated as one pseudo-data-frame — was tightened rather than extended: divergent grouping across members now errors instead of stitching a patchwork with bind_rows(), and the missing-variable argument was renamed and given a stored default on the collection itself. A documentation audit before 1.0.0 turned up six dispatch and print bugs and corrections across forty-plus files, which is the kind of thing that surfaces when an API is being frozen rather than extended.
◆ Prediction
A declared-stable API means the next releases should be additive or corrective rather than breaking, and the pre-1.0.0 pattern of breaking renames should stop. The tight version pinning between the two packages means surveytidy releases will keep following surveycore's.
traumar
0.0INFRA · APIS
Trauma registry statistics in R, tightening the numbers it reports against the literature.
◆ Current state
traumar computes trauma-centre performance measures from registry data, including relative mortality metrics, SEQIC quality indicators and predicted survival probability. The recent releases are dominated by correctness rather than coverage: 1.2.5 changed how the denominator for SEQIC indicator 7 is derived so it reflects the definitive care population rather than a raw row count, and 1.2.3 realigned probability_of_survival() with published coefficients. Version 1.2.6 completes a deprecation, turning the old n_decimal argument into an error.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a package whose outputs are reported numbers, and it is behaving accordingly: the notable changes in this window alter results rather than add features. A denominator computed as a row count instead of a filtered population, and a survival calculation not matching the coefficients it cites, are both the kind of defect that quietly propagates into published figures, and both were corrected here. Around that sit in-house validation helpers written deliberately to avoid a new dependency, and a steady tidy-up of tests and tooling.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation family introduced in 1.2.4 to be applied more widely across the package's entry points, now that it exists and is deliberately kept internal. Further SEQIC indicators being reviewed against their definitions looks likely given indicator 7 needed it, though the entries name no specific one as next.
Alternatives to surveycore and traumar
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either surveycore or traumar.
GeoThinneR
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
selection.index
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
packageRank
CRAN download analytics maintained one micro-change at a time, hundreds per year
melodi
INSEE's statistics API gets a French R client that keeps meeting its edge cases
bulkreadr
A bulk file reader became a labelled-survey-data toolkit, then went quiet
See all surveycore alternatives → · See all traumar alternatives →
Recent activity from surveycore and traumar
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agosurveycoreFirst stable release: all four survey design types complete ⚡
- 3mo agotraumarn_decimal deprecation completed; percentages allow negatives
- 3mo agotraumarSEQIC indicator 7 denominator corrected to definitive care
- 3mo agosurveycoreget_effective_n() computes effective sample size
- 3mo agosurveycoreCollections error on divergent grouping; .on_missing renamed
- 4mo agosurveycoreCRAN patch removing surveytidy from the vignette
- 6mo agotraumarIn-house validation family added to avoid a dependency
- 7mo agotraumarSurvival probability realigned with published coefficients
- 7mo agotraumarBinning and survival documentation clarified
- 1y agotraumarInternal renaming and a faster CRAN test path
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between surveycore and traumar?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. surveycore and traumar are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is surveycore better than traumar?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. surveycore and traumar are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to surveycore?
Top surveycore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveycore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveycore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to traumar?
Top traumar alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "traumar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/traumar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.