modeltime
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of StatsBase.jl and tidyr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
StatsBase.jl is in caretaker mode — correctness fixes in, dependency bumps out.
StatsBase.jl is deep in the 0.34 patch series, releasing every few months with changes that are either small correctness fixes or bot-authored dependency bumps. The most substantive recent release, 0.34.10, fixed weighted sampling with UnitWeights, sped up unweighted ecdf, and widened quantile to accept non-Real element types. Since then the tags have thinned to CI action bumps and a diff-only note.
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
tidyr is at 1.3.2, a collection of argument additions — fill() gains .by, expand_grid() gains .vary — and better error messages around unchop() and pivot_wider_spec(). The structural work is 1.3.0, which introduced separate_wider_delim(), separate_wider_position(), separate_wider_regex(), separate_longer_delim() and separate_longer_position() as thorough replacements for separate(), extract() and separate_rows().
StatsBase.jl is deep in the 0.34 patch series, releasing every few months with changes that are either small correctness fixes or bot-authored dependency bumps. The most substantive recent release, 0.34.10, fixed weighted sampling with UnitWeights, sped up unweighted ecdf, and widened quantile to accept non-Real element types. Since then the tags have thinned to CI action bumps and a diff-only note.
This is the shape of a foundational Julia package that has reached its intended scope: the API is settled, and maintenance means keeping compat bounds current and closing long-tail correctness issues raised by users. Nothing in the feed suggests new statistical capability is being staged. The most likely reason is that new work now lands in the downstream packages that build on StatsBase rather than in StatsBase itself.
Expect more 0.34.x patches on the same rhythm — CompatHelper bumps and occasional user-reported edge-case fixes — with no signal in these entries that a 0.35 or 1.0 is being prepared.
tidyr is at 1.3.2, a collection of argument additions — fill() gains .by, expand_grid() gains .vary — and better error messages around unchop() and pivot_wider_spec(). The structural work is 1.3.0, which introduced separate_wider_delim(), separate_wider_position(), separate_wider_regex(), separate_longer_delim() and separate_longer_position() as thorough replacements for separate(), extract() and separate_rows().
Two habits define this window. Verbs are being split into explicitly named variants rather than overloaded with arguments, which is what the separate_* family does to separate(). And .by is spreading as the standard way to express grouping inline — nest(.by=) in 1.3.0, fill(.by=) in 1.3.2 — pulling users away from wrapping calls in group_by().
Given that .by has now reached fill() and nest(), the next release most likely extends the same argument to further verbs rather than reworking another function family.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either StatsBase.jl or tidyr.
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
CmdStanPy is clearing deprecations ahead of a 2.0 it keeps announcing.
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
See all StatsBase.jl alternatives → · See all tidyr alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. StatsBase.jl and tidyr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. StatsBase.jl and tidyr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top StatsBase.jl alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "StatsBase.jl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/statsbase-jl for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tidyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.