tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
spiro vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of spiro and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
spiro vs webmockr: at a glance
What is spiro?
Cardiopulmonary exercise test data in R, one metabolic cart vendor at a time.
spiro imports and processes cardiopulmonary exercise testing data in R, handling the file formats that metabolic carts from Cosmed, Cortex, Vyntus, and ZAN emit, then interpolating, smoothing, and summarizing them into comparable variables. The bulk of ongoing work is vendor format compatibility rather than analysis features — 0.2.4 fixed Cosmed imports failing in rare cases and Cortex imports on newer devices, and 0.2.2 added English-language Vyntus files after 0.1.2 added French ones. The analysis side, spiro_max(), spiro_smooth() and spiro_plot(), has been stable for some time.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
spiro vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
spiro
0.0ANALYTICS
Cardiopulmonary exercise test data in R, one metabolic cart vendor at a time.
◆ Current state
spiro imports and processes cardiopulmonary exercise testing data in R, handling the file formats that metabolic carts from Cosmed, Cortex, Vyntus, and ZAN emit, then interpolating, smoothing, and summarizing them into comparable variables. The bulk of ongoing work is vendor format compatibility rather than analysis features — 0.2.4 fixed Cosmed imports failing in rare cases and Cortex imports on newer devices, and 0.2.2 added English-language Vyntus files after 0.1.2 added French ones. The analysis side, spiro_max(), spiro_smooth() and spiro_plot(), has been stable for some time.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a mature rOpenSci package whose remaining work is dictated by other people's file formats. Each device firmware revision, each regional language variant, and each ggplot2 release generates maintenance, and that is what fills the changelog. The API itself settled early, with the 0.1.0 rOpenSci review pass renaming the protocol helpers to the pt_* prefix and 0.2.0 replacing the confusingly named spiro_import() with spiro_raw().
◆ Prediction
Expect the pattern to continue: import fixes as vendor formats shift and periodic plotting updates tracking ggplot2, with no indication of new analysis capability.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to spiro and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either spiro or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all spiro alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from spiro and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agospiroCosmed and Cortex import fixes for newer devices
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agospiroEnglish-language Vyntus files supported
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agospiroR-devel compatibility and data frame printing fix
- 3y agospirospiro_raw() replaces the misleading spiro_import()
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agospiroFrench Vyntus support and protocol duration control
- 3y agospirospiro 0.1.1
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between spiro and webmockr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. spiro and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is spiro better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spiro and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to spiro?
Top spiro alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spiro alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spiro for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.