tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
sparsevctrs vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of sparsevctrs and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
sparsevctrs vs webmockr: at a glance
What is sparsevctrs?
Sparse vectors stopped being a storage trick and became something you can do arithmetic on
sparsevctrs supplies sparse vectors that live inside ordinary data frames and tibbles, which is what lets tidymodels carry wide, mostly-zero feature matrices without densifying them. Through 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 the package built out a computation layer on top of that storage — first summary statistics, then scalar and element-wise arithmetic — and everything since has been correctness work at the C level.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
sparsevctrs vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
sparsevctrs
0.0ANALYTICS
Sparse vectors stopped being a storage trick and became something you can do arithmetic on
◆ Current state
sparsevctrs supplies sparse vectors that live inside ordinary data frames and tibbles, which is what lets tidymodels carry wide, mostly-zero feature matrices without densifying them. Through 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 the package built out a computation layer on top of that storage — first summary statistics, then scalar and element-wise arithmetic — and everything since has been correctness work at the C level.
◆ Where it's heading
The release pattern splits cleanly at 0.3.0. Before it, new functions arrive in batches; after it, five consecutive releases are bug fixes, and the bugs are the kind that come with hand-written sparse kernels: a stack imbalance when sparse_multiplication() returns all zeros, undefined behaviour in multiplication, type errors in sparse_is_na(), coercion failures on NA input. That is the expected cost of an ALTREP-backed numerical layer, and the fixes are landing steadily.
◆ Prediction
With the arithmetic surface in place and the recent releases all narrow fixes, the next one is more likely another correctness patch than a new function family. The R devel fix in 0.3.5 suggests upcoming R releases are the current source of breakage.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to sparsevctrs and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either sparsevctrs or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all sparsevctrs alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from sparsevctrs and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 8mo agosparsevctrsSparse character vector fix for R devel
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agosparsevctrsStack imbalance in sparse multiplication fixed
- 1y agosparsevctrsSparse matrix coercion no longer errors on NA input
- 1y agosparsevctrssparsity() fixed for classed numeric vectors
- 1y agosparsevctrsUndefined behaviour in sparse multiplication fixed
- 1y agosparsevctrsScalar and element-wise arithmetic for sparse vectors ⚡
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between sparsevctrs and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. sparsevctrs and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is sparsevctrs better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sparsevctrs and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to sparsevctrs?
Top sparsevctrs alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sparsevctrs alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sparsevctrs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.