← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

slendr vs usmapdata

A side-by-side editorial comparison of slendr and usmapdata — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

slendr vs usmapdata: at a glance

Featureslendrusmapdata
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themespopulation-genetics, simulation, tree-sequences, python-interopr-packages, geospatial, census-data, cartography
Last editorial update2h ago48m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is slendr?

Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.

slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().

Read the full slendr trajectory →

What is usmapdata?

usmapdata ships its 2025 shapefiles on the year-indexed model it adopted in 0.4.0.

usmapdata supplies the boundary data behind usmap's plotting functions. Since 0.4.0 it has been year-indexed: us_map(data_year = ) selects a vintage, and each Census release is added as its own year with older ones still reachable. 1.1.0 adds 2025. 1.0.0 closed the package's longest-standing gap by adding Puerto Rico, retroactively across every vintage.

Read the full usmapdata trajectory →

slendr vs usmapdata: editorial side-by-side

S
slendr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.

◆ Current state

slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().

◆ Where it's heading

Since the 1.0.0 release added non-neutral simulation, the work has shifted from capability to friction. A large share of recent notes concerns Python environment handling, conda activation races on Windows, dependency pruning that made shiny optional, and argument names that misled users, as when gene_flow()'s rate argument turned out to mean total ancestry proportion rather than a rate. That is the profile of a package whose scientific surface is settled and whose remaining problems are the ones users actually hit.

◆ Prediction

Expect the uv-based environment path to move from fallback to default once it has proven itself, given the notes already describe an environment variable for making it so. The deprecated rate argument in gene_flow() is explicitly slated for removal in a future major release, which is the clearest signal here of what a 2.0 would contain.

U
usmapdata
INFRA · APIS
2.5

usmapdata ships its 2025 shapefiles on the year-indexed model it adopted in 0.4.0.

◆ Current state

usmapdata supplies the boundary data behind usmap's plotting functions. Since 0.4.0 it has been year-indexed: us_map(data_year = ) selects a vintage, and each Census release is added as its own year with older ones still reachable. 1.1.0 adds 2025. 1.0.0 closed the package's longest-standing gap by adding Puerto Rico, retroactively across every vintage.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has settled into a predictable rhythm — one shapefile vintage per year, with structural change rare and clustered. The two changes that mattered were data_year in 0.4.0, which turned a single-vintage dataset into a time series, and the tibble-to-data-frame switch in 0.6.0 that reduced what downstream callers have to depend on.

◆ Prediction

The stated policy — each year added going forward, previous years reachable through data_year — points to a 2026 vintage as the next release. Nothing in these notes suggests further change to the data model.

Alternatives to slendr and usmapdata

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either slendr or usmapdata.

See all slendr alternatives → · See all usmapdata alternatives →

Recent activity from slendr and usmapdata

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 23d agousmapdata2025 Census shapefiles added
  2. 1mo agoslendrEphemeral uv Python environments remove the setup step
  3. 7mo agoslendrgene_flow() separates migration rate from ancestry proportion
  4. 9mo agoslendrshiny made optional; SLiM 5.1 and Python 3.13 required
  5. 0y agousmapdataPuerto Rico added across every map vintage
  6. 1y agoslendrconda activation reverted to a slower but reliable path
  7. 1y agousmapdataus_map() returns a data frame instead of a tibble
  8. 1y agoslendrBackends raised to SLiM 5.0, tskit 0.6.4 and msprime 1.3.4
  9. 1y agousmapdata2024 Census shapefiles added
  10. 1y agousmapdatadata_year turns the package into a multi-vintage archive
  11. 1y agoslendrNon-neutral models arrive; slim() interface simplified
  12. 2y agousmapdataMap data moves to 2023 shapefiles

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between slendr and usmapdata?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. usmapdata is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is slendr better than usmapdata?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. usmapdata is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to slendr?

Top slendr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "slendr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/slendr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to usmapdata?

Top usmapdata alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "usmapdata alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/usmapdata for the full list with editorial commentary on each.