← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

sftime vs webchem

A side-by-side editorial comparison of sftime and webchem — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

sftime vs webchem: at a glance

Featuresftimewebchem
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesspatiotemporal, r-spatial, interoperability, tidyverse-integrationcheminformatics, web-apis, data-access, ropensci
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is sftime?

The spatiotemporal companion to sf, moving at the pace of the packages around it.

sftime extends sf with an active time column, giving R a data frame class for data that is both spatial and temporal. Its recent history is almost entirely integration work: 0.3.0 added conversion methods from spatstat point patterns, sftrack and sftraj movement objects and cubble data frames, plus dedicated tidyr::drop_na() and dplyr::dplyr_reconstruct() methods. The two releases since are a namespace version-check correction and a switch from the magrittr pipe to the native pipe in examples.

Read the full sftime trajectory →

What is webchem?

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

Read the full webchem trajectory →

sftime vs webchem: editorial side-by-side

S
sftime
ANALYTICS
0.0

The spatiotemporal companion to sf, moving at the pace of the packages around it.

◆ Current state

sftime extends sf with an active time column, giving R a data frame class for data that is both spatial and temporal. Its recent history is almost entirely integration work: 0.3.0 added conversion methods from spatstat point patterns, sftrack and sftraj movement objects and cubble data frames, plus dedicated tidyr::drop_na() and dplyr::dplyr_reconstruct() methods. The two releases since are a namespace version-check correction and a switch from the magrittr pipe to the native pipe in examples.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's job is to be interoperable, so its releases follow whatever the surrounding spatial and tidyverse packages do. The dplyr_reconstruct() work is the clearest example of why that matters: inheriting sf's method caused column binding to silently return an sf object where an sftime object was expected, which is the kind of class-preservation bug that only surfaces two steps downstream. Development is sparse, roughly one release a year.

◆ Prediction

Expect further conversion methods as new spatiotemporal classes appear in the R spatial ecosystem, and continued tracking of dplyr and tidyr generics. The entries do not indicate any planned change to the sftime class itself.

W
webchem
ANALYTICS
0.0

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

◆ Current state

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

◆ Where it's heading

Two opposing forces run through these entries. The package keeps widening its coverage — ChEMBL in 1.2.0, LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers via Wikidata, structure images, Mol export — while the open, unauthenticated end of the chemical web keeps contracting. The other consistent thread is interface harmonisation: successive releases have converged the get_* functions on the same query and from arguments, tibble returns, and CAS reformatting, so the package feels like one interface rather than a dozen wrappers.

◆ Prediction

Expect further defunct functions and URL repairs as more providers move behind keys or shut down, alongside occasional additions of sources that remain open. The entries show no sign of a general credential-management layer, which is what a package facing this trend would eventually need.

Alternatives to sftime and webchem

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either sftime or webchem.

See all sftime alternatives → · See all webchem alternatives →

Recent activity from sftime and webchem

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agosftimeExamples switched to the native R pipe
  2. 11mo agosftimeFixes the cubble namespace version check
  3. 1y agowebchemRepairs broken URLs; ChemSpider check now needs a key
  4. 1y agosftimeConverts from spatstat, sftrack and cubble objects
  5. 3y agowebchemChemIDplus and PAN queries removed as sources shut down
  6. 3y agowebchemAdds ChEMBL access for bioactive compound data
  7. 4y agowebchemcir_query() returns a tibble, a breaking change
  8. 4y agowebchemAdds Mol structure export; aw_query renamed to bcpc_query
  9. 5y agowebchemFetches LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers from Wikidata

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between sftime and webchem?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. sftime and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is sftime better than webchem?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sftime and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to sftime?

Top sftime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sftime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sftime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to webchem?

Top webchem alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webchem alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webchem for the full list with editorial commentary on each.