← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

serofoi vs webchem

A side-by-side editorial comparison of serofoi and webchem — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

serofoi vs webchem: at a glance

Featureserofoiwebchem
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesepiverse-trace, serology, force-of-infection, bayesian-inferencecheminformatics, web-apis, data-access, ropensci
Last editorial update4h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is serofoi?

serofoi grew a serosurvey simulator alongside the force-of-infection models it was built to fit.

serofoi estimates the force of infection from serological survey data using Bayesian serocatalytic models fitted through Stan. Beyond fitting it now simulates serosurveys — specifying a model and a survey design and generating the data such a survey would produce. The most recent release is visualisation and naming work.

Read the full serofoi trajectory →

What is webchem?

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

Read the full webchem trajectory →

serofoi vs webchem: editorial side-by-side

S
serofoi
ANALYTICS
0.0

serofoi grew a serosurvey simulator alongside the force-of-infection models it was built to fit.

◆ Current state

serofoi estimates the force of infection from serological survey data using Bayesian serocatalytic models fitted through Stan. Beyond fitting it now simulates serosurveys — specifying a model and a survey design and generating the data such a survey would produce. The most recent release is visualisation and naming work.

◆ Where it's heading

The package moved from fitting-only to a fit-and-simulate pair. 0.1.0 added simulation from time- or age-varying force-of-infection trends and simplified the fitted object down to a Stan fit; 1.0.2 broadened simulation into full serosurvey generation with its own vignette. 1.0.3 then spent its effort on naming consistency and plotting options, which is what a package does once its scope is set.

◆ Prediction

With simulation and fitting both in place, the natural next step is tooling that closes the loop between them — recovery checks or study-design guidance built on simulated surveys.

W
webchem
ANALYTICS
0.0

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

◆ Current state

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

◆ Where it's heading

Two opposing forces run through these entries. The package keeps widening its coverage — ChEMBL in 1.2.0, LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers via Wikidata, structure images, Mol export — while the open, unauthenticated end of the chemical web keeps contracting. The other consistent thread is interface harmonisation: successive releases have converged the get_* functions on the same query and from arguments, tibble returns, and CAS reformatting, so the package feels like one interface rather than a dozen wrappers.

◆ Prediction

Expect further defunct functions and URL repairs as more providers move behind keys or shut down, alongside occasional additions of sources that remain open. The entries show no sign of a general credential-management layer, which is what a package facing this trend would eventually need.

Alternatives to serofoi and webchem

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either serofoi or webchem.

See all serofoi alternatives → · See all webchem alternatives →

Recent activity from serofoi and webchem

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agowebchemRepairs broken URLs; ChemSpider check now needs a key
  2. 1y agoserofoiConstant FoI plots, r-hat plotting and shorter parameter names
  3. 1y agoserofoiSerological surveys can now be simulated end to end
  4. 2y agoserofoiSimulation functions added; fitted output simplified to a Stan fit
  5. 3y agoserofoiFirst release: three force-of-infection models and the core modules
  6. 3y agowebchemChemIDplus and PAN queries removed as sources shut down
  7. 3y agowebchemAdds ChEMBL access for bioactive compound data
  8. 4y agowebchemcir_query() returns a tibble, a breaking change
  9. 4y agowebchemAdds Mol structure export; aw_query renamed to bcpc_query
  10. 5y agowebchemFetches LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers from Wikidata

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between serofoi and webchem?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. serofoi and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is serofoi better than webchem?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. serofoi and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to serofoi?

Top serofoi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "serofoi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/serofoi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to webchem?

Top webchem alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webchem alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webchem for the full list with editorial commentary on each.