tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
rtflite vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of rtflite and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
rtflite vs webmockr: at a glance
What is rtflite?
rtflite stopped being an RTF writer and became the conversion layer for clinical table output.
rtflite generates the RTF tables clinical study reports are built from, a Python answer to the R tooling that has owned this niche. Over one dense month it grew a full export path: DOCX in 2.2.0, DOCX concatenation in 2.3.0, a configurable LibreOffice converter in 2.4.0, and HTML plus PDF in 2.5.0. The three releases since have been documentation, test infrastructure, and typing work — the feature push has stopped and consolidation has started.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
rtflite vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
rtflite
0.0ANALYTICS
rtflite stopped being an RTF writer and became the conversion layer for clinical table output.
◆ Current state
rtflite generates the RTF tables clinical study reports are built from, a Python answer to the R tooling that has owned this niche. Over one dense month it grew a full export path: DOCX in 2.2.0, DOCX concatenation in 2.3.0, a configurable LibreOffice converter in 2.4.0, and HTML plus PDF in 2.5.0. The three releases since have been documentation, test infrastructure, and typing work — the feature push has stopped and consolidation has started.
◆ Where it's heading
Every format addition routes through the same LibreOffice converter rather than a per-format implementation, and 2.4.0's breaking change made that converter an injectable object you can configure and reuse. That is the shape of a package expecting to run inside a pipeline that produces hundreds of tables, not one that converts a document at a time. The recent quiet — snapshot tests moved onto `pytest-r-snapshot`, docs migrated, pandas and pyarrow dropped from dev dependencies — reads as work to stay dependency-light while the surface stabilizes.
◆ Prediction
With the export matrix filled in and three consecutive infrastructure-only releases, the next substantive change is most likely on the input side — table construction and pagination — since `page_by` and `subline_by` are the only feature area still generating bug reports in these notes.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to rtflite and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rtflite or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all rtflite alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from rtflite and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4mo agortfliteMulti-section body typing tightened; pandas dropped from dev deps
- 7mo agortfliteAPI reference renders Pydantic field metadata
- 7mo agortfliteDocumentation site migrated to Zensical
- 7mo agortfliteSnapshot tests moved to pytest-r-snapshot
- 7mo agortfliteHTML and PDF export complete the output matrix ⚡
- 7mo agortfliteLibreOffice conversion becomes an injectable converter object
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between rtflite and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. rtflite and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is rtflite better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rtflite and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to rtflite?
Top rtflite alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rtflite alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rtflite for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.