← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

RMVMR vs treeshap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of RMVMR and treeshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

RMVMR vs treeshap: at a glance

FeatureRMVMRtreeshap
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmendelian randomization, r, radial methods, geneticsshap, model explainability, tree ensembles, r package
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is RMVMR?

RMVMR is being tidied in lockstep with MVMR, the package it wraps

RMVMR provides radial multivariable Mendelian randomization — radial IVW estimation and plots layered over the MVMR package's conditional instrument-strength machinery. It has no independent release schedule: versions arrive alongside MVMR's, pin a minimum MVMR version, and fix defects in the seam between the two. Its most recent release landed the same day as new versions of MVMR and OneSampleMR.

Read the full RMVMR trajectory →

What is treeshap?

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

Read the full treeshap trajectory →

RMVMR vs treeshap: editorial side-by-side

R
RMVMR
ANALYTICS
0.0

RMVMR is being tidied in lockstep with MVMR, the package it wraps

◆ Current state

RMVMR provides radial multivariable Mendelian randomization — radial IVW estimation and plots layered over the MVMR package's conditional instrument-strength machinery. It has no independent release schedule: versions arrive alongside MVMR's, pin a minimum MVMR version, and fix defects in the seam between the two. Its most recent release landed the same day as new versions of MVMR and OneSampleMR.

◆ Where it's heading

The work is code hygiene with results held fixed. ivw_rmvmr() now fits the radial IVW model explicitly rather than inheriting variables left over from the orientation loop, an undocumented data element carrying unused intermediate frames is gone, and plot_rmvmr() stops recomputing univariate radial analyses it already has — roughly halving the RadialMR calls with identical output. Each note is explicit that coefficients, standard errors and degrees of freedom are unchanged, which is a deliberate contrast with MVMR's own 2026 releases, where several fixes did change reported values.

◆ Prediction

Because the package pins MVMR versions rather than vendoring behaviour, the next release most likely follows MVMR's next correctness fix; nothing in the notes points to independent feature work.

T
treeshap
ANALYTICS
0.0

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

◆ Current state

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is breadth of model support rather than new explanation methods: every release since the first CRAN submission adds or repairs a unify() backend. Maintenance is community-driven, with named contributors fixing the framework they personally use. Nothing in these entries points at work on the SHAP algorithms themselves.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to add or repair another unify() adapter as a contributor brings their own framework, rather than to change how explanations are computed.

Alternatives to RMVMR and treeshap

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either RMVMR or treeshap.

See all RMVMR alternatives → · See all treeshap alternatives →

Recent activity from RMVMR and treeshap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoRMVMRRMVMR fixes a gencov error and halves redundant radial calls
  2. 3mo agoRMVMRRMVMR 0.4.4
  3. 3mo agotreeshapGPBoost support lands; xgboost adapter repaired
  4. 4mo agoRMVMRRMVMR 0.4.3
  5. 5mo agoRMVMRRMVMR now requires MVMR 0.4.3 or later
  6. 1y agoRMVMRRMVMR 0.4.1
  7. 2y agotreeshapFixes broken lightgbm.unify examples
  8. 2y agotreeshapMulti-output model explanations added
  9. 2y agotreeshapFirst CRAN release consolidates the unify() adapters

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between RMVMR and treeshap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. RMVMR and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is RMVMR better than treeshap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. RMVMR and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to RMVMR?

Top RMVMR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "RMVMR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rmvmr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to treeshap?

Top treeshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treeshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treeshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.