← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

rjdqa vs weird

A side-by-side editorial comparison of rjdqa and weird — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

rjdqa vs weird: at a glance

Featurerjdqaweird
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesofficial-statistics, seasonal-adjustment, quality-assurance, r-packageanomaly-detection, r-package, distributional, robust-statistics
Last editorial update55m ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is rjdqa?

rjdqa keeps refining one screen: the seasonal adjustment quality dashboard

rjdqa builds quality assessment dashboards for seasonal adjustment models produced by JDemetra+, aimed at official statisticians reviewing adjusted series. Essentially all development goes into two functions, simple_dashboard() and its denser variant simple_dashboard2(). Version 0.1.6 adds parameters to append observations to the forecast and to control whether the residual trading-days test is printed, defaulting to monthly series only, plus outlier table layout work and user-defined calendar regressor support in sc_dashboard().

Read the full rjdqa trajectory →

What is weird?

weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.

An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.

Read the full weird trajectory →

rjdqa vs weird: editorial side-by-side

R
rjdqa
ANALYTICS
0.0

rjdqa keeps refining one screen: the seasonal adjustment quality dashboard

◆ Current state

rjdqa builds quality assessment dashboards for seasonal adjustment models produced by JDemetra+, aimed at official statisticians reviewing adjusted series. Essentially all development goes into two functions, simple_dashboard() and its denser variant simple_dashboard2(). Version 0.1.6 adds parameters to append observations to the forecast and to control whether the residual trading-days test is printed, defaulting to monthly series only, plus outlier table layout work and user-defined calendar regressor support in sc_dashboard().

◆ Where it's heading

The package has converged on a single deliverable and is tuning it against reviewer practice. Each release adds a parameter that lets the analyst include or exclude one element of the dashboard, or adjusts how densely information is packed into the fixed space of the layout. The td_effect default — print the test only for monthly series — is characteristic: the knowledge about when a diagnostic is meaningful is being encoded into the tool rather than left to the reader.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of adding one toggle per diagnostic per release points at the same thing again, most likely another test given a conditional default, rather than a new dashboard function alongside the two that exist.

W
weird
ANALYTICS
0.0

weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.

◆ Current state

An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.

◆ Where it's heading

The refactor onto a shared distribution representation is the decision everything else follows from. It let 2.1.0 add hdr() and parameters() methods for kde objects rather than bespoke accessors, and it let 3.0.0 bring in dist_mclust() to turn a Gaussian mixture model into the same object type — so a mixture, a kernel density estimate and a fitted distribution all flow through one interface. The 3.0.0 additions lean visual and multivariate: outlier maps plotting score distance against orthogonal distance, biplot projections with variable axes overlaid, and an augment() method for robust PCA objects. Dependencies have been shed steadily along the way — lookout, interpolation — while mvscale() moved out and then back in.

◆ Prediction

Expect surprisals() coverage to keep extending to further model classes, and the multivariate and robust-PCA diagnostics introduced in 3.0.0 to gain the same distributional-object treatment as the univariate side.

Alternatives to rjdqa and weird

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rjdqa or weird.

See all rjdqa alternatives → · See all weird alternatives →

Recent activity from rjdqa and weird

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoweirdOutlier maps, biplot projections, and Gaussian mixtures as distributional objects
  2. 3mo agoweirdsurprisals() reaches glm objects; lookout dependency dropped
  3. 6mo agoweirdPackage refactored onto distributional objects; density_scores becomes surprisals
  4. 9mo agorjdqaForecast observations and conditional trading-days test in dashboards
  5. 1y agorjdqaFix tail() usage on ts objects
  6. 2y agorjdqaFix dependency minimums and outlier ordering
  7. 2y agorjdqasimple_dashboard2() added; deprecated sa_dashboard() removed
  8. 2y agoweirdWine reviews dataset replaced with a fetch function
  9. 2y agorjdqasimple_dashboard() introduced; sa_dashboard() deprecated
  10. 7y agorjdqaFirst CRAN release

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between rjdqa and weird?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. rjdqa and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is rjdqa better than weird?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rjdqa and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to rjdqa?

Top rjdqa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rjdqa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rjdqa-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to weird?

Top weird alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "weird alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/weird-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.