tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
ReLTER vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ReLTER and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
ReLTER vs webmockr: at a glance
What is ReLTER?
An interface to Europe's long-term ecosystem research network that went quiet after 2.0.
ReLTER provides programmatic access to the eLTER network — the European long-term ecosystem research infrastructure — pulling site metadata, datasets and activities from DEIMS-SDR and enriching them with taxonomic resolution via PESI and WORMS and raster layers from European OpenDataScience. Version 1.0.0 consolidated the function surface and passed into rOpenSci review; 1.1.0 addressed the reviewers' feedback and added vignettes and a Docker install path. Version 2.0.0 was tagged in late 2022 with release notes consisting only of a merge commit message, and nothing has shipped since.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
ReLTER vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
ReLTER
0.0ANALYTICS
An interface to Europe's long-term ecosystem research network that went quiet after 2.0.
◆ Current state
ReLTER provides programmatic access to the eLTER network — the European long-term ecosystem research infrastructure — pulling site metadata, datasets and activities from DEIMS-SDR and enriching them with taxonomic resolution via PESI and WORMS and raster layers from European OpenDataScience. Version 1.0.0 consolidated the function surface and passed into rOpenSci review; 1.1.0 addressed the reviewers' feedback and added vignettes and a Docker install path. Version 2.0.0 was tagged in late 2022 with release notes consisting only of a merge commit message, and nothing has shipped since.
◆ Where it's heading
The visible arc runs from a scattered set of getSite* functions to a reviewed, documented package, and then stops. The absence of notes on the 2.0.0 tag makes it impossible to say from this feed what that major version changed, and the three-year silence afterwards is the more informative signal. What the package does remains useful — the eLTER data it wraps has no other R interface — but the release history gives no evidence of active development.
◆ Prediction
Nothing in these entries supports a confident prediction about future releases; the feed shows a major version with no notes followed by silence. Whether the package is dormant or simply publishing releases elsewhere cannot be determined from what is here.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to ReLTER and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ReLTER or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all ReLTER alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from ReLTER and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agoReLTERReLTER an Interface for the 'eLTER' Community v2.0.0
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
- 4y agoReLTERReLTER v1.1.0
- 4y agoReLTERReLTER v1.0.0 ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ReLTER and webmockr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. ReLTER and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is ReLTER better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ReLTER and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to ReLTER?
Top ReLTER alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ReLTER alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/relter for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.