tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
RBesT vs rlistings
A side-by-side editorial comparison of RBesT and rlistings — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:clinical-trials
RBesT vs rlistings: at a glance
What is RBesT?
RBesT is teaching its Bayesian decision rules to answer two-sided questions.
RBesT builds meta-analytic-predictive priors — the machinery for borrowing historical control data into a new trial — and evaluates the operating characteristics of decisions made with them. The stable line has spent several releases on effective sample size: ESS for normal mixtures via a new `family` argument, boundary corrections when no responses or no non-responses are observed, and stabilised ELIR computations. The 1.9-0 release candidate extends the normal, binomial and Poisson outcome functions to two-sided decisions.
What is rlistings?
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
rlistings renders clinical-trial subject listings and paginates them for regulatory output, sitting alongside rtables on the shared formatters engine. The releases in this window are dominated by pagination correctness: repeated key columns across pages, splitting by a variable, ordered-factor handling, column gaps, and font metrics. Development is a large rotating contributor set inside the insightsengineering organisation.
RBesT vs rlistings: editorial side-by-side
RBesT
0.0ANALYTICS
RBesT is teaching its Bayesian decision rules to answer two-sided questions.
◆ Current state
RBesT builds meta-analytic-predictive priors — the machinery for borrowing historical control data into a new trial — and evaluates the operating characteristics of decisions made with them. The stable line has spent several releases on effective sample size: ESS for normal mixtures via a new `family` argument, boundary corrections when no responses or no non-responses are observed, and stabilised ELIR computations. The 1.9-0 release candidate extends the normal, binomial and Poisson outcome functions to two-sided decisions.
◆ Where it's heading
Two currents run through the changelog. One is ESS hardening — nearly every release since 1.7-4 fixes another edge case where the ELIR calculation aborted or returned something unstable, which is what happens when a quantity used to justify prior strength to regulators gets scrutinised. The other is Stan and brms integration debt: array syntax updates, a minimum Stan version bump, truncated prior generation for `mixstanvar`, deterministic EM. The RC's contributor list shows a second active maintainer, and the work is broader than any recent stable release.
◆ Prediction
The release candidate covers all three outcome families and has already absorbed a round of review comments, so the next step is most likely the 1.9-0 CRAN release itself rather than further feature work.
rlistings
0.0ANALYTICS
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
◆ Current state
rlistings renders clinical-trial subject listings and paginates them for regulatory output, sitting alongside rtables on the shared formatters engine. The releases in this window are dominated by pagination correctness: repeated key columns across pages, splitting by a variable, ordered-factor handling, column gaps, and font metrics. Development is a large rotating contributor set inside the insightsengineering organisation.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is progressively delegating pagination to formatters rather than implementing it — paginate_listing() was refactored to call formatters' paginate_to_mpfs() directly, and truetype font support arrived through a new formatters API. That reduces duplicated logic but ties the package's page-break behaviour to a dependency it shares with rtables. Feature work beyond pagination is thin: better error messages for unsupported column classes, a cheatsheet.
◆ Prediction
Expect pagination fidelity to remain the focus, with changes arriving as formatters exposes more of its layout machinery rather than as rlistings-native features.
Alternatives to RBesT and rlistings
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either RBesT or rlistings.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all RBesT alternatives → · See all rlistings alternatives →
Recent activity from RBesT and rlistings
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agoRBesTTwo-sided decisions across normal, binomial and Poisson outcomes ⚡
- 1y agoRBesTJSON read and write for mixture objects
- 1y agoRBesTess() fixed inside apply functions
- 1y agorlistingsError and message handling for difftime and zero-row listings
- 1y agoRBesTESS for normal mixtures in the exponential family
- 1y agoRBesTTruncated mixture priors for brms, plus faster Stan models
- 1y agorlistingsTrueType font support and col_gap in pagination
- 2y agorlistingssplit_into_pages_by_var() and pagination moved onto formatters
- 2y agoRBesTStan array syntax update and CRAN system requirements
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between RBesT and rlistings?
Both compete on the same themes — clinical-trials — within Analytics. RBesT and rlistings are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is RBesT better than rlistings?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. RBesT and rlistings are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to RBesT?
Top RBesT alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "RBesT alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rbest for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rlistings?
Top rlistings alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rlistings alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rlistings for the full list with editorial commentary on each.