← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

RadialMR vs weird

A side-by-side editorial comparison of RadialMR and weird — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

RadialMR vs weird: at a glance

FeatureRadialMRweird
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmendelian-randomization, radial-plots, correctness-audit, statistical-inferenceanomaly-detection, r-package, distributional, robust-statistics
Last editorial update1h ago47m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is RadialMR?

RadialMR's 2026 release corrects degrees of freedom that had been wrong since documentation.

RadialMR implements radial-plot formulations of IVW and MR-Egger Mendelian randomization, with outlier detection and interactive plotting. The recent history is thin on features and increasingly focused on the arithmetic: 1.2.4 in July 2026 fixes the degrees of freedom returned by egger_radial() to the documented n-2, corrects the heterogeneity p-value that inherited the same error, and repairs a negated lower bound in the random-effects bootstrap standard error search interval in ivw_radial().

Read the full RadialMR trajectory →

What is weird?

weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.

An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.

Read the full weird trajectory →

RadialMR vs weird: editorial side-by-side

R
RadialMR
ANALYTICS
0.0

RadialMR's 2026 release corrects degrees of freedom that had been wrong since documentation.

◆ Current state

RadialMR implements radial-plot formulations of IVW and MR-Egger Mendelian randomization, with outlier detection and interactive plotting. The recent history is thin on features and increasingly focused on the arithmetic: 1.2.4 in July 2026 fixes the degrees of freedom returned by egger_radial() to the documented n-2, corrects the heterogeneity p-value that inherited the same error, and repairs a negated lower bound in the random-effects bootstrap standard error search interval in ivw_radial().

◆ Where it's heading

This is a package being read closely by its maintainer rather than extended. The 1.2.x line pairs statistical corrections with defensive hardening — an rmr_format class check so unformatted input fails with a clear message, and plotly_radial() dispatching on object class instead of counting list elements. Both are the kind of change made while auditing, not while building.

◆ Prediction

Expect the audit to continue into the remaining estimator internals and print methods rather than new radial variants; the entries show no feature work queued.

W
weird
ANALYTICS
0.0

weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.

◆ Current state

An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.

◆ Where it's heading

The refactor onto a shared distribution representation is the decision everything else follows from. It let 2.1.0 add hdr() and parameters() methods for kde objects rather than bespoke accessors, and it let 3.0.0 bring in dist_mclust() to turn a Gaussian mixture model into the same object type — so a mixture, a kernel density estimate and a fitted distribution all flow through one interface. The 3.0.0 additions lean visual and multivariate: outlier maps plotting score distance against orthogonal distance, biplot projections with variable axes overlaid, and an augment() method for robust PCA objects. Dependencies have been shed steadily along the way — lookout, interpolation — while mvscale() moved out and then back in.

◆ Prediction

Expect surprisals() coverage to keep extending to further model classes, and the multivariate and robust-PCA diagnostics introduced in 3.0.0 to gain the same distributional-object treatment as the univariate side.

Alternatives to RadialMR and weird

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either RadialMR or weird.

See all RadialMR alternatives → · See all weird alternatives →

Recent activity from RadialMR and weird

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoRadialMRegger_radial() degrees of freedom corrected to n-2
  2. 1mo agoweirdOutlier maps, biplot projections, and Gaussian mixtures as distributional objects
  3. 3mo agoweirdsurprisals() reaches glm objects; lookout dependency dropped
  4. 3mo agoRadialMRroxygen2 bumped; package-level helpfile added
  5. 4mo agoRadialMRUnspecified codebase optimizations
  6. 6mo agoweirdPackage refactored onto distributional objects; density_scores becomes surprisals
  7. 1y agoRadialMRggplot2 v4 warning removed from plot_radial()
  8. 2y agoweirdWine reviews dataset replaced with a fetch function

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between RadialMR and weird?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. RadialMR and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is RadialMR better than weird?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. RadialMR and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to RadialMR?

Top RadialMR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "RadialMR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/radialmr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to weird?

Top weird alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "weird alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/weird-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.